Bitcoin ETFs Soar: +1,272 BTC Inflows Drive a $115M Surge, While Ethereum ETFs Suffer a 22,457 ET...
Bitcoin ETFs have received major inflows yet Ethereum ETFs shed significant funds. Recent statistics from LookinOnChain show Bitcoin ETFs purchased 1,272 BTC with a net value of $115 million. Investors displayed opposite sentiments in the cryptocurrency ETF market. Ethereum ETFs experienced a concerning 22,457 ETH withdrawals which resulted in a complete market loss of $51.36 million. Market conditions determine investor preferences through these opposing investment trends.
Mar 3 Update:10 #Bitcoin ETFsNetFlow: +1,272 $BTC(+$115.06M)🟢#Fidelity inflows 2,096 $BTC($189.63M) and currently holds 200,534 $BTC($18.15B).9 #Ethereum ETFsNetFlow: -22,457 $ETH(-$51.36M)🔴#iShares(Blackrock) outflows 13,626 $ETH($31.16M) and currently holds 1,292,489… pic.twitter.com/EMk29y2ki6
— Lookonchain (@lookonchain) March 3, 2025
Bitcoin ETFs Gain Momentum with Strong Inflows
The Bitcoin ETFs absorbed substantial fund inflows through the acquisition of 2,096 BTC worth $189.63 million from Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund (FBTC). The BTC holdings of Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund now reach 200,534 BTC making it one of the most powerful Bitcoin ETFs on the market.
ARK 21Shares Bitcoin ETF (ARKB) continued to attract capital through its acquisition of 2,305 BTC while the market experienced volatility. The Bitcoin ETF market experienced additional investments through Bitwise Bitcoin ETF (BITB) and Invesco Galaxy Bitcoin ETF (BTCO) that added 47 BTC and 23 BTC respectively.
The largest Bitcoin ETF operated by iShares (BlackRock) Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) experienced a total net loss of 2,910 BTC during the previous day while maintaining 573,136 BTC in its assets.
Despite iShares (BlackRock) IBIT’s outflows, the Bitcoin ETF sector maintains a positive outlook because major institutions such as Fidelity and ARK 21Shares demonstrate growing BTC value appreciation.
Ethereum ETFs Bleed as Investors Pull Funds
The Bitcoin ETF sector performed well during this period, yet the Ethereum ETF segment showed substantial investor withdrawal. The iShares (BlackRock) Ethereum Trust (ETHA) incurred a record-breaking 13,626 ETH sell-off, amounting to $31.16 million in its total value. Across multiple ETFs, such as Grayscale Ethereum Trust (ETHE) and Bitwise Ethereum ETF (ETHW), investors withdrew 8,772 ETH and 19 ETH from their assets, respectively.
Ethereum ETF holdings demonstrated a considerable decrease that suggests institutional investors have turned more pessimistic in their investment outlook. During the past week, Ethereum Exchange-Traded Funds experienced a total capital withdrawal of 136,201 ETH worth $311.49 million.
Market Implications
ETF investment trends demonstrate that investors now lean toward Bitcoin instead of Ethereum. Institutional investors continue to favor Bitcoin because of its proven durability alongside increasing institutional investments. The excessive buying activities of Fidelity reinforce Bitcoin’s role as a promising long-term investment choice for value preservation.
Ethereum’s present difficulties signify a potential market correction period for its financial assets. Institutional investors avoided significant ETH purchases and regular withdrawals possibly because of regulatory issues, macroeconomic challenges, and post-rally profit extraction.
Bitcoin ETF inflows show potential to drive BTC pricing upward, but Ethereum requires a push to break its ongoing decreasing trend.
Metaplanet Buys the Bitcoin Dip, Spends $13 Million on Yet Another BTC Buying Spree
Japanese firm Metaplanet has purchased 156 more Bitcoin for its reserve, worth roughly $13.4 million at today’s prices. Taking advantage of the recent decline in prices, it has increased its hoard of the apex cryptocurrency to 2,391 BTC, worth just over $222 million at current prices.
The latest purchase comes as Metaplanet explores a potential listing in the United States.
Metaplanet Stacks More Bitcoin
According to a company disclosure, the Tokyo-listed investment company acquired Bitcoin for $13.4 million at an average price of $85,590 per Bitcoin.
This purchase happened after Bitcoin’s price dropped to as low as $83,500 last week following macroeconomic headwinds such as President Trump’s tariffs, which was worsened by the Bybit saga. At the time of writing, Bitcoin is changing hands at $92,858.
With Metaplanet’s BTC yield performance showing impressive results — 31.8% year-to-date for 2025 — the firm’s Bitcoin strategy has so far paid off.
Meanwhile, Metaplanet CEO Simon Gerovich also revealed that he was recently invited by officials at the New York Stock Exchange and Nasdaq to introduce their platforms and functions.
“We are considering the best way to make Metaplanet shares more accessible to investors around the world,” Gerovich said in an X post.
The Road To 21,000 BTC
Metaplanet started stacking sats and bulking up its Bitcoin stockpile in April last year. The company adopted Bitcoin as a core part of its financial strategy to hold BTC as a hedge against Japan’s economic difficulties, including sky-high national debt and currency devaluation.
The Simon Gerovich-led firm has since established a structured Bitcoin acquisition strategy through capital market activities, including plans to issue $745 million in zero-discount moving strike warrants, in what is dubbed the largest-ever equity capital raise for Bitcoin in Asia.
In January, Metaplanet announced that it was planning to amass 10,000 BTC by the end of 2025, followed by an even more aggressive push toward 21,000 BTC by 2026-end.
With an average purchase price of $82,100 per BTC, the firm is currently up around 13% on its Bitcoin investment since embracing the maiden crypto as a treasury asset. According to data from BitcoinTreasuries, Metaplanet is now Asia’s second largest corporate Bitcoin holder and the 14th biggest in the world.
Will Ethereum Price Crash to $1,000 or Is a Rebound Near?
Ethereum (ETH) has been on a sharp downward trajectory after reaching highs above $4,000. The price has now dropped below $2,100, leaving traders questioning whether the correction is nearing its end or if more pain is ahead. With increasing selling pressure and a weakening market structure, the big question remains—could ETH fall to $1,000, or is a strong recovery imminent?
This analysis will break down Ethereum’s key support and resistance levels, technical indicators, and potential price trajectory in the coming weeks.
Ethereum has been experiencing a continuous decline , forming lower highs and lower lows. After failing to hold above $3,500, the price sharply corrected, triggering increased selling pressure. ETH is currently testing a major support zone near $2,000, which has historically acted as a strong demand level.
The current market structure suggests that ETH is still in a bearish phase, with the downward momentum showing no clear signs of exhaustion yet. If Ethereum fails to hold above $2,000, a deeper correction toward $1,500-$1,600 could be the next step.
The $2,000 level is a significant support zone for ETH, as it has provided strong rebounds in the past. The last time Ethereum tested this area, buyers aggressively pushed the price back above $2,500, leading to a short-term relief rally.
However, if ETH breaks below $2,000, the next major support is around $1,500-$1,600, which was last tested during the 2023 bear market. A breakdown below this zone could increase the likelihood of Ethereum revisiting $1,200-$1,000, which would be a worst-case scenario for bulls.
The Relative Strength Index (RSI) is currently at 25, which is deep in oversold territory. Historically, RSI levels below 30 indicate that the asset is heavily sold and could be due for a short-term bounce. However, a sustained reversal will require ETH to regain key resistance levels and confirm bullish momentum.
The Heikin Ashi candles are still forming strong red bars, signaling that bearish pressure is dominant. For ETH to establish a trend reversal, it must print multiple green Heikin Ashi candles with increased volume.
While ETH price is currently sitting at crucial support , a break below $2,000 could lead to further downside. If Ethereum loses this key level, the first target would be $1,600-$1,500, and if market conditions deteriorate, a drop to $1,200-$1,000 could become a reality.
However, a direct crash to $1,000 seems unlikely unless the overall market sees extreme bearish sentiment, such as a significant Bitcoin correction or regulatory setbacks in the crypto space. For now, ETH still has chances to recover if bulls defend the $2,000 support zone.
For ETH price to regain bullish momentum , it must break key resistance levels, starting with $2,500-$2,600. A successful close above this range would indicate renewed buying interest and could push Ethereum toward $3,000 in the medium term.
However, as long as ETH remains below $2,500, the market structure remains bearish. A full-fledged recovery will require Ethereum to reclaim $3,200-$3,500, which was previously a critical support-turned-resistance level.
Ethereum is currently trading at a make-or-break level, with $2,000 acting as the last strong support before a potential deeper correction. Short-term traders might look for a bounce from this level, while long-term investors could consider accumulating ETH if it drops closer to $1,500-$1,600.
For now, ETH’s fate depends on whether it can hold $2,000 or if bears continue pushing it lower. Traders should watch for a confirmed breakout above $2,500 to signal a reversal, while a break below $1,800 could open doors for further declines.
‘Shield crypto from federal overreach’: Winklevoss twin says
Cameron Winklevoss, co-founder of crypto exchange Gemini, has urged lawmakers to enact crypto regulations that protect the industry from federal overreach.
In a March 4 statement on X, Winklevoss claimed that regulatory enforcement actions have been weaponized to stifle crypto innovation. He argued that agencies are being used against digital assets for political purposes, calling for legal protections to prevent politically motivated enforcement actions.
Any future crypto legislation must make it very hard to weaponize federal agencies against crypto. Crypto needs rules, not because investors lack protection but because builders and companies lack protection — we need a firewall against federal regulatory attacks. This should be…
Winklevoss criticized Senator Elizabeth Warren, alleging that she has influenced the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission to undermine the crypto sector through excessive enforcement actions. He warned that Warren could extend similar influence over the Commodity Futures Trading Commission and other financial watchdogs in the future.
He expressed concerns that agencies such as the SEC and CFTC could be leveraged by political figures to push an anti-crypto agenda. Drawing parallels with Warren’s past actions against banks and fintech companies, he emphasized the need for a “zero trust model” in dealing with regulators.
Senator Elizabeth Warren’s previous anti-crypto actions , including her most recent scrutiny of Tether’s banking relationships with President Donald Trump’s nominee for Commerce Secretary, Howard Lutnick, are indicative of a broader pattern that could extend to other financial regulatory bodies, Winklevoss fears.
Winklevoss also voiced distrust toward financial regulators, claiming that anti-crypto policymakers have infiltrated regulatory agencies and are using their power to push political agendas rather than ensure fair oversight.
He specifically referenced SEC Chair Gary Gensler, who previously served as CFTC chairman from 2009 to 2014, suggesting that regulatory agencies could be influenced by political ideologies, posing risks to crypto entrepreneurs and businesses.
This perspective aligns with broader industry sentiments regarding regulatory scrutiny. For instance, the SEC’s recent decision to drop its case against Gemini and a host of other crypto platforms was seen as a positive development by Winklevoss, who has previously criticized regulatory actions against crypto platforms.
Additionally, Gemini’s recent achievement of securing in-principle approval for an Investment Firm License in Malta signifies the company’s commitment to complying with international regulatory standards, further emphasizing the importance of clear and fair regulations.
Moreover, Winklevoss’s stance mirrors the crypto industry’s broader concerns about potential “debanking” practices targeting crypto-related businesses.