DAR Open Network 價格D

EPT Coins: ## Overview EPT coins are a type of cryptocurrency. ## Potential Features 1. *Blockchain-based*: Secure and transparent transactions. 2. *Decentralized*: Operates independently. 3. *Digital asset*: Can be stored, transferred, and traded. ## Possible Uses 1. *Payments*: Fast and secure transactions. 2. *Investments*: Potential for value appreciation. 3. *Utility tokens*: Access to specific services or products. ## Considerations 1. *Market volatility*: Prices can fluctuate rapidly. 2. *Regulation*: Evolving regulatory landscape. 3. *Adoption*: Widespread adoption determines long-term value. If you have more specific information about EPT coins, I'd be happy to provide more detailed insights!

BTC Hits $90,000 – What’s Next? 📊 1. BTC/USD Price Chart (All-Time – Logarithmic View) 🟨 Explanation: A logarithmic chart displaying BTC rallies from 2013, 2017, 2021, and now 2025. Focus: Post-ATH corrections and the duration of bullish cycles in each era. 🎯 Use Case: “This chart shows us that Bitcoin gains massive momentum in every cycle, but short-term corrections are inevitable afterward.” 📈 2. BTC Dominance Chart (BTC.D) 🟧 Explanation: This chart shows Bitcoin’s dominance in the total crypto market. Focus: When dominance rises, altcoins get suppressed. When it falls, altcoin season may begin. 🎯 Use Case: “BTC dominance is currently around X%. If this chart starts to drop, we can expect significant movement in altcoins.” 🧠 3. TOTAL3 Chart – Altcoin Market Cap (Excluding BTC) 🟩 Explanation: Represents the total market cap of all altcoins excluding BTC. Focus: Tracks how much capital is flowing into altcoins and whether an uptrend is starting. 🎯 Use Case: “If the TOTAL3 chart breaks to the upside, it signals the beginning of an altcoin rally.” 💹 4. BTC Technical Analysis – Short-Term Price Action 🟥 Explanation: Current BTC/USD chart showing support and resistance zones, EMAs, RSI, etc. Focus: Support zone at 85K–90K and resistance zone at 95K–100K. 🎯 Use Case: “BTC is currently trying to hold above 90K. If it breaks above 95K, the psychological 100K barrier could be the next target.” 🔥 5. Heatmap – Top Performing Altcoins (24h) 🟦 Explanation: Visualizes the most actively traded and appreciated altcoin projects. Focus: Indicates which altcoin sectors are attracting capital. 🎯 Use Case: “AI and gaming tokens seem to be leading the past 24 hours. This might indicate that investors are rotating BTC profits into altcoins.”

Still some room for USDT.D to drop and $BTC to reach higher. Early shorters in risk of getting rekt. Don't be one of them... lower your risk, make a good plan and time the market. Unless the SL is broken chances are moon is coming. Don't get too confident with either scenario. If a pump continuation is coming you will be able to find levels of retests. Shorting or longing- at this point in the market- trail both/either. Don't forget that a good plan is like a roadmap you can use even in the dark- you won't get lost and you will reach your destination, even if you have to park it for some time.

ZKSync’s parent company, Matter Labs, has been sued by Bankex, a now-defunct digital asset banking platform, which has accused it of intellectual property theft. According to law documents filed on March 19 with the New York State Supreme Court, former Bankex employees Alexandr Vlasov and Petr Korolev allegedly stole the company’s technology and used it to start Matter Labs, which went on to receive over $450 million in venture capital funding. According to the complaint, Bankex CEO Igor Khmel and the Bankex Foundation are the plaintiffs. They claim the Ethereum co-founder, Vitalik Buterin , reached out to Bankex sometime in 2017 to build operational software for “Plasma,” a technology that was floated as a way to make using Ethereum more affordable. Alexandr Vlasov and Petr Korolev were reportedly Bankex employees at the time, and they had the task of completing the Plasma project. Rather than work on the project which was assigned to them by the Bankex CEO, Vlasov and Korolev allegedly decided to use the opportunity to secretly develop “a competing company, Matter Labs, through which they intended to appropriate the blockchain technology of Bankex for their own use and benefit and to compete with Bankex.” The complaint also claimed that the two developers were secretly transferring “Bankex’s technology to Matter Labs and covertly developed and stored operational code bases,” all with the company’s resources and funding. Vlasov is currently the head of R&D at Matter Labs, while Korolev is the founder of blockchain security firm OXORIO, according to their LinkedIn profiles. Co-founder Alex Gluchowski, crypto-native investment fund Dragonfly, and Chris Burniske, a partner at Placeholder Capital and a former co-director at Matter Labs, have been listed as defendants in the lawsuit. They are also being sued for their alleged involvement and knowledge of the theft. A spokesperson for Matter Labs has said the claims are “entirely without merit,” claiming that the complaint is centered around ZKSync being built on code that was originally developed at Bankex. According to the spokesperson, the allegations are “false” because ZKsync is reportedly original technology that is not based on or derived from any code developed by Bankex. They have asserted confidence in their ability to beat the “baseless allegations” and are looking forward to a showdown in court. This is not the first time Matter Labs has been slammed with accusations of stealing intellectual property. In 2023, it was accused of copying some of Polygon’s codes without attribution and in the process made some false claims about the original work. The system whose codes were copied were Plonky2, a zk proof system that boasts very fast speed, and the copied parts were used to create a proving called Boojum. The alleged copy-and-paste was done without proper attribution, and Alex Gluchowski, the founder of Matter Labs, also claimed that Boojum was 10x faster than Plonky2. Matter Labs ultimately resisted the accusation, claiming that only 5% of Plonky2’s code was used, with attribution provided. They also expressed disappointment at Polygon for making such claims. The new lawsuit is yet another challenge Matter Labs has to deal with. The company also took heat last year when it attempted to trademark the term “ZK,” which led to criticism from its rival,s including StarkWare and Polygon . Matter Labs eventually withdrew the trademark applications in June 2024 following mass outcry. The company also had to lay off about 16% of its workforce in September 2024, citing market changes and strategic shifts. Cryptopolitan Academy: Coming Soon - A New Way to Earn Passive Income with DeFi in 2025. Learn More

Institutional interest in $EPT isn't mainstream yet, but there are a few signals that could attract it over time—especially if Elite Protocol continues refining its infrastructure and showing real-world utility. Right now, institutions are cautious with low to mid-cap tokens unless there's a compelling reason—strong tokenomics, regulatory clarity, a scalable product, or partnerships with enterprise-level projects. $EPT has potential, but it needs a few things to tip the scales: 1. Protocol Maturity: Institutions typically wait until a protocol has been stress-tested and shows consistent performance. If $EPT demonstrates that its ecosystem can handle higher loads and real utility (DeFi integrations, cross-chain compatibility, etc.), it becomes more appealing. 2. Liquidity and Custody Options: Institutional money needs deep liquidity and trusted custody services. If EPT listings expand to bigger exchanges or if staking mechanisms integrate with institutional platforms like Fireblocks or Anchorage, we’d likely see more serious interest. 3. Narrative Alignment: If EPT starts positioning itself as a key player in data integrity, compliance, or decentralized infrastructure—areas that align with institutional goals—it becomes more than just a speculative token. 4. On-Chain Metrics and Governance: Institutions pay attention to decentralized governance models, treasury management, and the strength of community development. If EPT’s governance system shows transparency and strategic direction, that’s a trust booster. So, while institutional players might not be rushing in yet, EPT could make the leap if it aligns its tech development and marketing with institutional-grade expectations. If a few key partnerships or integrations land in Q2 or Q3 2025, the tone could shift quickly. Want a breakdown of what signals to track for early signs of institut $EPT ional involvement?