Moon App 價格APP

Like I have said a few times already, picking onchain runners is easy, just go for the ones that kept building and getting their product ready during the tough market conditions. $HTS is the only #RWA gem I am holding, aiming to tokenize real estate, and their app already looks fire. The #RWA narrative needs doxxed teams who don’t shy away from legal compliance, and $HTS nails that perfectly. NFA, just a personal opinion.

The billionaires who used to run the show are now struggling to keep up. Elon Musk, Tim Cook, and Mark Zuckerberg are each trying to figure out how to survive a world where AI might tear down the exact systems they built. The same men who once crushed competition with new tech are now watching it come for them. They’re fighting to protect their empires from something they can’t fully control. According to The Wall Street Journal, this panic is already playing out in real time. This past Wednesday, Alphabet shares tanked more than 7% after a senior Apple executive admitted something unthinkable—Google search traffic through Safari just dropped for the first time in twenty years. Though Google later claimed search use is still growing on Apple devices, the market reaction was brutal. Tim Cook, CEO of Apple, is now trying to buy time. On the company’s recent earnings call, Tim didn’t launch any flashy features or major AI updates. Instead, he told investors to wait. “We just need more time to complete the work so they meet our high-quality bar,” he said. But while he’s asking for patience, Apple’s AI response is mostly silence and vague hype. Mark Zuckerberg, who built Facebook into an advertising machine, is now trying to keep it alive by turning it into an emotional chatbot factory. His new vision is to position AI as a friend for lonely people. It’s less about connection and more about keeping users locked in. Elon, who recently came back from messing around with DOGE and running X, is back at Tesla trying to convince investors the company still has juice. After Tesla stock slid, Elon jumped back into the spotlight to dangle promises of driverless cars again. “We’re not on edge of death—not even close,” he told analysts. The way he said it made people think of that old Monty Python line—“I’m not dead! … I feel happy!”—while everyone else is dragging your body to the dump. None of these tech giants are technically collapsing. Together, they’re worth around $7 trillion. But the fear underneath is obvious. They’re all staring down what could be a massive, slow collapse unless they adapt… fast. They’re now textbook cases of what Clayton Christensen called the Innovator’s Dilemma. In his book, he showed how companies doing everything right still fail when smaller players create something new. These new tools build markets in ways that the old companies never saw coming. Just like Netflix ended Blockbuster, and just like Apple’s iPhone blew past the phones of the 2000s, the next big shift might come from a startup nobody’s even watching. Big tech has seen this kind of threat before. During the dot-com boom, Pets.com looked like the next big winner, and failed fast. Even Christensen, who studied innovation for years, didn’t predict the iPhone. When it launched in 2007, he didn’t think it would shake up the phone industry. But it didn’t just kill old phones, it created mobile computing and the App Economy. Now, that app world may get flipped again. If AI agents become the new way people interact with services, Apple’s App Store model could start to vanish. People could just talk to bots instead of downloading anything. That might explain why Apple’s so quiet right now. Meanwhile, Google has at least put something on the table: Gemini, their AI assistant. But it’s not going smoothly. Gemini’s rollout was a mess. Users complained about biased answers, and Sundar Pichai, Google’s CEO, called the early responses “unacceptable.” He wrote, “No AI is perfect, especially at this emerging stage of the industry’s development, but we know the bar is high for us and we will keep at it for however long it takes.” The problem is that most of Google’s business still comes from ads. People clicking on links make the money roll in. But if people stop asking Google and start asking bots, the clicks dry up. That’s why everyone’s nervous. The startups don’t have that problem. They’re hungry. Right now, nobody’s dead. But it’s looking like someone might be soon. Your crypto news deserves attention - KEY Difference Wire puts you on 250+ top sites

Stablecoin Summer hits Asia 🍉 @Tether_to's USD₮ is now live natively on @KaiaChain, the ultra-fast, EVM-compatible L1 powering LINE Messenger’s Web3 stack. It boasts the highest number of DAUs across EVM chains. This brings stablecoin access to over 196 million monthly LINE users across Asia. What’s LINE? Asia’s leading message app is used daily across Japan, Thailand, and Taiwan. With 60+ mini apps on Kaia, it now doubles as a stablecoin-native wallet. 1️⃣ What’s Gone Live: • Native USD₮ integration on Kaia • Available via LINE’s self-custodial wallet • Usable for Mini Dapp rewards, DeFi, and cross-border payments • Peer-to-peer USD₮ transfers directly through LINE Messenger Just tap, send, and spend. 2️⃣ Who’s behind it: • Tether: The most used stablecoin globally, 1:1 USD-backed • Kaia: A high-performance L1 (born from Klaytn + Finschia) • LINE NEXT: LINE’s Web3 arm, building blockchain services inside LINE Together, they’re bringing stablecoins to the mainstream natively and at scale. 3️⃣ Why it matters: → USD₮ is now embedded inside Asia’s largest messaging platform → Supports real-time, final, low-fee transactions → Replaces clunky fiat rails with stable, seamless UX → Key use cases: DeFi, remittances, NFTs, tokenized assets, payments All within a platform people already use daily, from gaming to groceries. 4️⃣ What’s next: Kaia + LINE NEXT are laying rails for: • Real-world asset (RWA) tokenization • Global exchange integrations (CEX + DEX) • NFT-based economies and digital collectibles • Hybrid payment infrastructure across APAC 196M people just got stablecoins in their group chats. Grandma might airdrop you $10 next. Web3 finally feels... normal.

Google agreed to a $1.375B data privacy settlement with the Lone Star State over the alleged use of facial recognition, location data, and Chrome incognito. To date, no state has attained a settlement against Google for similar data privacy violations greater than $93M. Texas Attorney General (AG) Ken Paxton won a $1.375B settlement from Google to resolve claims of illegally tracking users’ geolocation, incognito searches, and biometric data. The attorney general said the settlement, which covered allegations in two separate lawsuits against the search engine and app giant, dwarfed all past settlements by other states with Google for similar data privacy violations. Google’s settlement came approximately 10 months after Paxton obtained a $1.4 billion settlement for Texas from Meta to resolve claims of unauthorized use of biometric data of Facebook and Instagram users. The attorney general said in a statement on Friday that Big Tech is not above the law in Texas. AG Paxton secured a $1.375 billion settlement with Google to deliver a historic win for the people of Texas with regard to data privacy and security rights. Even a multistate coalition that included forty states only secured just $391 million—almost a billion dollars less than Texas’s recovery. Paxton sued Google in 2022 for unlawfully tracking and collecting users’ private data. However, Google spokesman Jose Castaneda claimed that the company did not admit any wrongdoing or liability in the settlement, which involved allegations related to the Chrome browser’s incognito setting, disclosures related to location history on the Google Maps app, and biometric claims related to Google Photos. Paxton stated that this billion-dollar settlement was a major win for Texans’ privacy, and it told companies that they would pay for abusing the trust of his state’s residents. “For years, Google secretly tracked people’s movements, private searches, and even their voiceprints and facial geometry through their products and services. I fought back and won.” -Ken Paxton, Attorney General of Texas Notably, Castaneda said Google did not have to make any changes to products in connection with the settlement and that all of the policy changes that the company made in connection with the allegations were previously announced or implemented. Meta previously agreed to pay a record $1.4 billion to settle a lawsuit by the state of Texas over the Facebook owner’s unauthorized use of biometric data from users. Paxton’s office said ‘unbeknownst to most Texans,’ Meta ran facial recognition software on virtually every face contained in the photographs uploaded to Facebook for over a decade, capturing records of the facial geometry of the people depicted. The AG’s Meta settlement was a rare win against Big Tech’s surveillance overreach—but it was just the tip of the iceberg. Meta’s decade-long facial recognition scheme proved that Silicon Valley viewed privacy as optional until states started to crack down on big techs. Notably, Paxton asserted that any abuse of Texans’ sensitive data would be met with the full force of the law. The Texas AG said the win against Meta stopped the company’s practice of capturing and using the personal biometric data of millions of Texans without the authorization required by law. However, a spokesperson for Meta disclosed that the company was pleased to resolve the matter and looked forward to exploring future opportunities to deepen its business investments in Texas, including potentially developing data centers. KEY Difference Wire : the secret tool crypto projects use to get guaranteed media coverage

⚡️REPORT: Phantom pulled in $17M in April from its 0.85% in-app swap fee.