Ціна Real RealmREAL

European leaders are scrambling to speak directly with President Trump ahead of his one-on-one call with Vladimir Putin, a call the White House says will take place this week. This is the first publicly confirmed conversation between the two men in nearly three months, and it’s happening at a critical point in the stalled efforts to end Russia’s war in Ukraine. According to the Financial Times, Trump’s aides believe this call could define the US position in the next phase of peace talks. Emmanuel Macron, Friedrich Merz, and Keir Starmer have already scheduled a joint call with Trump on Monday—their second since Friday—in an attempt to influence the president’s strategy before the Kremlin conversation. Merz, the German Chancellor, said, “We can only hope that there will be further progress,” after stressing that both Washington and Europe were working “purposefully” to bring the war to an end. But European leaders still fear Trump might make a solo move that cuts Ukraine out of the picture entirely. Putin has refused to meet Volodymyr Zelenskyy face-to-face despite suggesting earlier that talks could happen. Last week, the Russian president rejected a meeting in Turkey, offering no reason. Over the past ten days, he’s declined to engage with any terms he didn’t set himself. Even as US officials grew frustrated, Trump’s team avoided blaming the Kremlin. Instead, the president said on Friday, “I always felt a peace deal was not possible without me,” justifying why he personally arranged the call with Putin. Once the Trump–Putin call ends, the president is expected to speak to Zelenskyy directly. In the meantime, Zelenskyy traveled to Rome on Sunday to meet with Vice President JD Vance. It was their first meeting since their public confrontation in Washington back in February. This time, things were calmer. “It was a good meeting,” Zelenskyy said, adding that Secretary of State Marco Rubio was also present. The meeting in Rome focused heavily on the failed negotiations in Istanbul, where Zelenskyy said Russia “sent a low-level delegation with no decision-making authority.” He added, “I reaffirmed Ukraine’s readiness for real diplomacy and stressed the importance of a full and unconditional ceasefire as soon as possible.” Sergei Lavrov, Russia’s Foreign Minister, told Rubio on Saturday that Moscow is drafting a document that will outline what it wants in exchange for a ceasefire. Rubio said in an interview with CBS, “We don’t want to be involved in this process of just endless talks. There has to be some progress, some movement forward.” He made it clear that continued US engagement depends on whether both sides show real willingness to compromise. “If a document is agreed in the next few days… we can feel good about continuing to remain engaged,” he said. “If not, perhaps we’ll have a different assessment.” Back in Kyiv, there’s concern that if Trump’s administration walks away from the process, US military support could be pulled or cut down, giving Russia more ground. Ukraine has relied on coordinated support from Europe and the US, and any gap could be dangerous. That’s why Zelenskyy joined Friday’s call with Trump and the European leaders. He’s staying close to the action—every single step. In another meeting held in Rome on Sunday, Ursula von der Leyen, head of the European Commission, said this week would be “crucial” for making progress toward peace. She didn’t give specifics but emphasized that there’s little time left before talks collapse again. While diplomats are talking, Russia is moving forward on the battlefield. Over the weekend, Ukraine’s Air Force reported that Russia launched 273 drones and decoys—the most extensive drone attack since the war began. Ukrainian defense units described it as a deliberate attempt to exhaust air defenses before peace talks pick up. Your crypto news deserves attention - KEY Difference Wire puts you on 250+ top sites

Moody’s downgraded the United States’ credit rating on Friday, and Wall Street is now bracing for the fallout. The downgrade dragged America down one notch from its top-tier rating. It was the final confirmation that the federal government’s $36 trillion debt is now impossible to ignore. The downgrade came as Republican lawmakers pushed forward a massive tax-and-spending bill in Congress, sending mixed signals to investors already nervous about where all this is heading. The bill, dubbed the “Big Beautiful Bill,” has not cleared key legislative steps, and investors are watching closely. President Donald Trump, now back in the White House, has called for unity around the proposal. But that hasn’t done much to calm the nerves of traders, especially as the bill could add trillions more to the national debt. The Republican-controlled House and Senate are still fighting over its final version, and it’s not clear how they plan to balance more tax cuts with any real cuts to spending. Carol Schleif, chief market strategist at BMO Private Wealth, warned that the downgrade might push investors to become more cautious. She said the bond market is watching “what transpires in Washington this year in particular.” Schleif added that as Congress continues to negotiate, bondholders are ready to pressure lawmakers into sticking to stricter fiscal behavior. Moody’s became the last of the major ratings agencies to pull the plug. Fitch downgraded the US in 2023, and S&P made their move all the way back in 2011. Gennadiy Goldberg, head of US rates strategy at TD Securities, said the downgrade likely won’t force mass selling since most investment funds adjusted their rules years ago. But Goldberg also said the downgrade would “refocus the market’s attention” on the tax-and-spending bill being debated in Congress. Meanwhile, the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget estimated that the bill could add around $3.3 trillion to the national debt by 2034. If temporary policies in the bill are extended, that number jumps to $5.2 trillion. Moody’s also pointed out that multiple administrations have failed to reduce deficits and that it doesn’t expect current proposals to do much to change that. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said the White House is trying to keep 10-year yields from spiking. The current yield is 4.44%, which is still lower than it was before Trump returned to office. But that number could change quickly. Scott has also warned Congress that they need to raise the debt ceiling by mid-July. The US hit its borrowing limit back in January, and the Treasury has been using what it calls “extraordinary measures” to keep the government from defaulting. Without an increase, the country could run out of cash by August — the so-called X-date. That fear is already showing up in bond prices. Yields on Treasury bills due in August are higher than those due before or after, signaling that investors are worried about a potential government cash crunch. Speaker Mike Johnson has said the House hopes to vote on the bill before Memorial Day on May 26. Harrison Fields, principal deputy press secretary at the White House, dismissed the downgrade and said the critics are “wrong, just as they were about the impact of Trump’s tariffs.” Fields claimed that the tariffs led to record investments, strong job growth, and no inflation. Steven Cheung, communications director for the administration, went even further, calling Moody’s economist Mark Zandi a political enemy of Trump. Zandi works for Moody’s Analytics, a separate part of the company, and declined to comment. Some analysts believe the final bill may not be as damaging as it seems. Barclays now projects that the deficit will grow by $2 trillion over the next ten years under the plan — a smaller number than the $3.8 trillion increase expected before Trump came back. They’re pointing to revenue from tariffs and other offsets as the reason. But not everyone agrees. Michael Zezas, a strategist at Morgan Stanley, wrote in a recent note that the bill would increase the deficit in the near term without giving the economy much of a boost. KEY Difference Wire helps crypto brands break through and dominate headlines fast

dot hl’s and memecoiners are the most monetizable real users in crypto today. No other userbase comes close. Maybe only 2021 NFTers.

In a crypto environment marked by volatility, stablecoins emerge as the preferred safe haven for venture capital investors. Despite geopolitical tensions and market fluctuations, these digital currencies pegged to traditional currencies are attracting growing attention. Why does this particular segment generate so much enthusiasm among the most savvy financiers? For venture capital investors, the verdict is clear: dollar payments via stablecoins represent today the most tangible and promising use of the blockchain. The first quarter of 2025 confirmed this trend. While the US trade war caused a general collapse of classic cryptos, stablecoins showed remarkable resilience. Their total market cap jumped by $25 billion, now reaching $227.1 billion. This performance during a crisis did not go unnoticed by analysts. In its latest report , the Pitchbook team is categorical: Dollar settlements remain the flagship application of cryptocurrencies, partly spared by wider risk aversion movements. For investors, this stability in the face of market turmoil is a major asset. The phenomenon extends far beyond the United States. In Europe, Meta plans to integrate USDC and USDT to pay creators on its social networks. At the same time, many countries are developing their own alternatives to the dollar. Nations such as Singapore and the United Arab Emirates are seeking to create stablecoins backed by their national currencies, aiming to free themselves from the dollar’s dominance in the crypto ecosystem. Projections for the stablecoin market are dizzying: according to some analysts, stablecoin capitalization could reach $2 trillion by 2028, nearly ten times their current value. This expected exponential growth naturally attracts the attention of venture capitalists, who anticipate “a sharp increase in investments in the short term, particularly in startups specializing in payments, fund transfers, and treasury management.” However, the path to this growth is not without obstacles. Security remains a crucial issue, especially after incidents like the Bybit hack . According to Pitchbook, institutional investors will become more demanding, requiring real-time reserve verification tools and solutions simplifying cryptographic key management. Startups capable of solving these technical problems will be the big winners in upcoming funding rounds. On the regulatory front, the outlook has recently darkened. In the United States, the GENIUS bill, which aimed to regulate stablecoins, recently failed in the Senate with a vote of 48 against 49, far from the 60 votes required. This legislative setback could slow institutional adoption but does not dampen the enthusiasm of venture capitalists. The most anticipated event remains the IPO of Circle, the issuer of USDC. This IPO could not only definitively legitimize the stablecoin business model but also boost valuations across the entire payments and crypto infrastructure ecosystem. In sum, the stablecoin market today represents an essential bridge between traditional finance and the crypto world. A recent Fireblocks report highlights this decisive shift: 90% of financial institutions use or plan to integrate these assets . This massive adoption by banks, once reluctant, is profoundly reshaping the contours of the global digital economy.

Why is it paid? Because I don’t want lurkers. I want action-takers. And I give real value that people actually make money from. You will NOT find another group like this run by someone who’s living it.