Ціна PhaverSOCIAL

Crypto community member David Hollmer proposed via X (formerly Twitter) a strategy for the Artificial Superintelligence Alliance (ASI). Hollmer urged ASI, formed from the ongoing Fetch.ai (FET), SingularityNET (AGIX), and Ocean Protocol (OCEAN) token merger, to accept payments for its AI services using any cryptocurrency, not just the native FET/ASI token. Hollmer argued accepting diverse crypto payments promotes easier adoption of ASI’s services. He outlined a system where ASI implements a transparent conversion mechanism, using a minimal transaction fee, to automatically swap incoming payment tokens into FET (soon to be ASI). This protocol benefits FET/ASI holders by increasing demand and value for the token through the conversion process, Hollmer stated. While ASI’s current model emphasizes the native token, Hollmer contends this broader payment flexibility significantly widens ASI’s user base and offers greater long-term benefits. In the meantime, the crypto user’s observation and proposal reignited discussions surrounding FET, a once-hyped crypto asset in the AI sector. FET represented one of the highly discussed tokens in the early days of decentralized AI solutions, beaming with massive potential amid heightened expectations. The crypto asset has struggled since the 2021 bear market but appears to be realigned with the general crypto market trend, considering its price behavior since the beginning of 2025. Related: AI Coins Heat Up: Social Activity Puts TAO, RNDR, FET in Spotlight TradingView’s data show a FET decline in Q1 2025 before the latest recovery, aligning with the crypto market surge in April. The AI token gained nearly 140% during the latest rally and traded around resistance at the time of writing. Related: AI Crypto Hype Train? Fetch.ai (FET) Shows Signs of a Price Reversal Further price appreciation for FET/ASI depends on overcoming current resistance. Increased adoption of ASI Alliance technologies, driven by user-friendly strategies like Hollmer’s proposal, can be the catalyst for the token to push towards higher valuations. Disclaimer: The information presented in this article is for informational and educational purposes only. The article does not constitute financial advice or advice of any kind. Coin Edition is not responsible for any losses incurred as a result of the utilization of content, products, or services mentioned. Readers are advised to exercise caution before taking any action related to the company.

The world of cryptocurrency is rapidly intersecting with traditional politics, creating new dynamics and, at times, raising eyebrows. A recent event involving a popular memecoin tied to former President Donald Trump has ignited a conversation among lawmakers, particularly concerning transparency and ethics for elected officials holding digital assets. At the heart of this discussion is Wyoming Senator Cynthia Lummis, a well-known supporter of the crypto space, who voiced significant concerns following news of a private dinner planned for top holders of the TRUMP memecoin. Senator Cynthia Lummis, a Republican representing Wyoming, is one of the most vocal proponents of cryptocurrency on Capitol Hill. Her support stems from a belief in the innovation and potential of digital assets and blockchain technology. She even publicly disclosed her own Bitcoin holdings, setting an example for transparency in a nascent asset class. However, her support for the technology doesn’t blind her to potential ethical pitfalls. According to a report by CNBC, Senator Lummis specifically highlighted the need for standardized rules governing how elected U.S. officials hold and disclose digital assets. Her comments were a direct reaction to the news surrounding President Donald Trump’s upcoming gala dinner. The dinner, scheduled for May 22nd in Washington, D.C., is reportedly a private event for the top 220 holders of the TRUMP memecoin (ticker: TRUMP). The event’s website, GetTrumpMemes, promotes this exclusive gathering. While former presidents are not subject to the same disclosure rules as sitting officials, the nature of the event—a private dinner for holders of a specific, volatile digital asset tied to a political figure—raises questions about influence, access, and the potential for conflicts of interest, particularly if current officials were to attend or if the precedent impacts future interactions. Senator Lummis’s concern centers on the lack of clear, mandated rules for current elected officials regarding their digital asset holdings. Unlike stocks, bonds, or real estate, the regulatory framework for digital assets is still evolving, and disclosure requirements for politicians are not as standardized or comprehensive. The current situation highlights a gap in existing ethics and transparency regulations. While officials are required to disclose holdings of traditional assets, the rules for cryptocurrencies and other digital assets are less defined. This ambiguity creates several challenges: Senator Lummis’s call for legislation aims to address these issues by creating a level playing field and ensuring that digital asset holdings are subject to the same level of scrutiny and disclosure as traditional assets. This would involve defining what constitutes a reportable digital asset, setting clear thresholds for disclosure, and establishing penalties for non-compliance. Senator Lummis is not alone in expressing unease about the situation. Alaska Senator Lisa Murkowski, also a Republican, reportedly echoed similar concerns about the TRUMP memecoin dinner event. This suggests that the issue is not confined to one political viewpoint but touches upon broader ethical considerations that resonate across the aisle. The fact that senators from different states and potentially different political leanings on other issues are highlighting this concern underscores its importance. It signals a growing awareness within the U.S. Senate about the potential implications of the increasing overlap between political figures and the often-unregulated world of memecoins and other digital assets. Memecoins are a unique and often volatile segment of the cryptocurrency market. Unlike Bitcoin or Ethereum, which were designed with specific technological goals, memecoins are often created as social experiments, jokes, or, in this case, tied to cultural or political figures. Their value is often driven by social media trends, community hype, and speculation rather than underlying technology or utility. The existence of a memecoin specifically tied to a prominent political figure like Donald Trump is a relatively new phenomenon. While it can be seen by supporters as a way to engage a community or even as a form of political fundraising (though the dinner is for holders, not necessarily a direct fundraiser), it inherently links a political brand to a speculative, unregulated financial instrument. This linkage is precisely what raises red flags for lawmakers concerned about ethics and influence. The volatility and speculative nature of memecoins make the need for clear disclosure rules even more pressing for public officials. A sudden surge or drop in value could create significant financial incentives or pressures that could potentially sway an official’s stance on relevant legislation. To better understand the gap Senator Lummis is highlighting, it’s useful to compare the existing rules for traditional assets with the current state for digital assets: This table illustrates the regulatory lag when it comes to digital assets. The existing framework, designed for traditional finance, doesn’t easily accommodate the unique characteristics of cryptocurrencies and memecoins. The concerns raised by Senator Lummis and others underscore the increasing urgency for comprehensive crypto regulation in the United States. While significant debate exists on *how* to regulate the space, there is growing consensus on the need for clarity, particularly concerning consumer protection, market integrity, and, as highlighted here, the ethical considerations for public officials. Legislation addressing digital asset holdings by officials could be part of broader regulatory efforts. Such legislation might include: The involvement of a prominent political figure and a memecoin in this specific instance brings the issue into sharp focus. It moves the conversation from abstract regulatory principles to concrete examples that the public can more easily understand. For individuals involved in the cryptocurrency space or simply concerned about government ethics, this development offers several key takeaways: This event serves as a powerful reminder that as digital assets become more integrated into the economy and society, the regulatory and ethical frameworks governing them must evolve as well. The concerns raised by Senator Lummis are a critical step in prompting that necessary evolution. The news surrounding the Trump memecoin dinner and the subsequent concerns voiced by Senator Cynthia Lummis and Senator Lisa Murkowski underscore a critical juncture at the intersection of cryptocurrency and U.S. politics. While digital assets offer exciting potential, their increasing presence in the financial lives of elected officials highlights an urgent need for clear, standardized rules regarding disclosure and potential conflicts of interest. Senator Lummis, a staunch crypto advocate, is paradoxically leading the charge for greater regulation in this specific area, recognizing that transparency is vital for maintaining public trust and ensuring ethical governance. As memecoins and other digital assets become intertwined with political figures and events, the call for comprehensive legislation to govern officials’ holdings grows louder, signaling a necessary evolution in how the U.S. navigates the complex and rapidly changing landscape of digital finance within the political sphere. To learn more about the latest explore our article on key developments shaping crypto regulation in the US. Disclaimer: The information provided is not trading advice, Bitcoinworld.co.in holds no liability for any investments made based on the information provided on this page. We strongly recommend independent research and/or consultation with a qualified professional before making any investment decisions.

TRON DAO X account compromised ⚠️ 🔸 On May 2, a team member fell victim to a social engineering attack, allowing an attacker to post fake content and send DMs from our account 🔸 Even after access was restored, the attacker tried to sell posts for payment #TRONDAO #Crypto

TRON DAO X account was compromised from 9:25 AM PST on May 2, 2025. An unauthorized party published a post containing a contract address, sent direct messages, and followed various accounts. A member of team was targeted in a malicious social engineering attack, which led to

XRP token has seen increased institutional support as the odds of a spot XRP Exchange-Traded Fund (ETF) approval rise. The market’s confidence has skyrocketed since approval odds skyrocketed from 65% to 85% in under two months. Grayscale submitted its S-1 document to the SEC to convert its XRP trust and began a 45-day review process. Bitwise obtained formal acceptance to launch its physically-backed XRP ETP. These developments followed the SEC’s extension of the Franklin Templeton decision deadline to June 17. Meanwhile, investors have maintained positive expectations. The approval numbers for a spot XRP ETF have risen after Grayscale and Bitwise made their application public to convert their XRP investment vehicles. Related: XRP ETF Decision Moved to June 17 as SEC Extends Franklin Templeton Timeline Beyond spot products, institutional exposure to XRP derivatives has also been rising. ProShares launched three XRP futures-based ETFs, including leveraged and inverse options, with these products already trading in U.S. markets. Related: SEC Pushes XRP, ETH, and DOGE ETF Deadlines to June—Final Call in Q4? While not spot-based, they demonstrate increasing institutional interest in XRP. Looking at the chart, XRP has held its price at $2.20 through the combined support of its 50—and 100-day EMAs. The technical analysis indicators suggest bullish price trends. The MACD indicator indicates a buy signal after its main line surpasses the signal line. The positive histogram expansion further indicates additional price growth potential. The descending trendline established earlier this year remains an essential barrier to price growth. Market participants observe this price point to determine whether an XRP value surpassing $3.00 will occur. However, short-term resistance is likely around $2.50 and $2.80, where profit-taking may slow gains. The new leadership at the SEC has positively impacted consumer perception. On April 21, SEC Chair Paul S. Atkins gained approval as head of the commission, strengthening attitudes toward crypto investment products. The betting platform Polymarket shows a 79% likelihood that the SEC will approve an XRP ETF before the end of this year. Market trends indicate that the SEC could approve a spot product. Despite momentum, challenges remain. According to Santiment, XRP has lost its social dominance over the last three months, which can constrain price changes driven by retail investors. If XRP price descends below $2.20, technical support levels are key. XRP will likely receive support from its 200-day Exponential Moving Average at $1.99. If that level fails, price could move down towards support levels near $1.61. Beyond price and technicals, XRP holds a strong market position. It continues to rank as the fourth biggest crypto overall. XRP’s circulating supply stands at 58.5 billion tokens out of a maximum of 100 billion with the token’s fully diluted valuation estimated at $221.27 billion. Disclaimer: The information presented in this article is for informational and educational purposes only. The article does not constitute financial advice or advice of any kind. Coin Edition is not responsible for any losses incurred as a result of the utilization of content, products, or services mentioned. Readers are advised to exercise caution before taking any action related to the company.