Preço de TRONbetLiveLIVE

Berachain’s unique Proof-of-Liquidity mechanism will officially go live on March 24, expanding reward distribution beyond BEX pools to other apps and vaults. In a 21 March post on X, Berachain Foundation announced that its PoL will go live on March 24, with more vaults introduced into the reward pool. Originally, Berachain’s ( BERA ) PoL launched within BEX pools only to distribute BGT in order to enable decentralized on-chain governance. Now, starting Monday, this will expand beyond BEX to more apps and vaults, meaning they will also be able to earn rewards. The first batch of Requests for Reward Vault from apps has already been approved. For now, rewards will be limited to DEX pools, but new vaults and use cases will be approved starting next week. For holders of Berachain’s governance token BGT, this means that they will now be able to decide where rewards will go. Berachain’s blockchain aims to solve the misalignment of incentives in the Proof-of-Stake blockchains. In a typical PoS blockchain, users have to lock their tokens to secure the blockchain and earn staking rewards. While locking crypto is good for security, it’s bad for the blockchain’s economy because it means less crypto is being used in apps and transactions. As a result, users prefer to just stake their assets to get rewards than use DeFi apps built on the blockchain. Berachain was built to solve this dilemma between security and DeFi activity through its novel PoL consensus mechanism . In a typical PoS blockchain, validators earn rewards for validating transactions and pass a portion of those rewards to their delegators based on their stakes. However, on Berachain validators have to allocate most of their rewards—which are earned in BGT—to the app’s reward vault rather than keeping it all to themselves. This encourages applications to bribe validators—usually in the form of its native tokens—to incentivize them to send them more BGT. The end result is a competitive environment where validators are encouraged to support the best apps. Meanwhile, Berachain’s token BERA is trading at $6.35, down by 57% from its all-time high of $14.99 set on Feb. 6 at its launch. Since crashing from its post-launch peak to around $4 within just a few days, the price has been moving sideways in the range of approximately $4 – $5 until a bullish breakout to $9 between 18 – 21 of February, supported by an increase in volume. The momentum continued into early March, with the price peaking $9.2 before facing resistance and then pulling back. After that, the price gradually declined , stabilizing around the $6 support level. Volume has also tapered off, suggesting that traders are waiting for the next catalyst.

The stock market and the crypto space are becoming more interconnected. Just posted on its mainnet, Injective announced that Tesla (TSLA) stock is now accessible for on-chain trading. Previously exclusively available on the Solstice testnet, this feature is now available on the mainnet of Injective, therefore enabling complete Tesla stock trading capability. For investors who wish to trade stocks in a decentralized way free from traditional trading hours, this decision creates new opportunities. Wait no more for the market to close in the afternoon or open in the morning. Using Injective’s blockchain technology, one has more flexible, open, 24/7 access to Tesla stock. $TSLA is now live on Injective. You saw it on the Solstice testnet, now experience Tesla on mainnet for the first time. Fully onchain stocks with 24/7 access and endless opportunities. Only possible on Injective. https://t.co/wpEnUmElUj — Injective 🥷 (@injective) March 18, 2025 Tesla is not the first stock to enter the Injective ecosystem. On March 14, as we previously reported , Injective launched a new iAsset enabling on-chain trading of Robinhood (HOOD) stock. Users of this feature can trade Robinhood stock at any moment with more liquidity than on traditional stock markets. These benefits make Injective even more appealing to investors seeking new approaches to trading financial products. Furthermore, Injective provides a governance proposal aiming at including McDonald’s stock perpetual contracts into the dApps ecosystem of her network. By means of its governance approach, the platform seeks to include McDonald’s shares in the on-chain environment, therefore extending the scope of the decentralized financial market. Moreover, on February 10, Injective started an on-chain index tracking hundreds of the biggest public stocks via a single unified index. Investors with this index get unrestricted access to the stock market without having to pass middlemen that may slow down the transaction process. Big corporations are helping the injective ecosystem to get stronger. Officially joining as a validator on the Injective blockchain was Deutsche Telekom MMS, a division of Deutsche Telekom. This move is a genuine attempt to improve the security and decentralization of the network as well as a mere name addition. Through on-chain governance and transaction validation, Injective shows even more how blockchain technology may coexist peacefully with traditional financial institutions. On the other hand, on March 4, Injective partnered with Libre, a digital infrastructure platform granting access to accredited and institutional investors. By means of this integration, Injective gains the institutional fund issuing and distribution platform, thereby enabling big investors to access a range of on-chain investment funds, including the just announced BlackRock Money Market Fund. Stated differently, injective attracts not only retail traders but also heavyweight investors more and more. Meanwhile, as of the writing time, INJ is swapped hands at about $9.94, up 3.25% over the last 24 hours and 6.09% over the last 7 days.

🔥LATEST: $TRX officially goes live on Solana.

In case you missed it... New YouTube video is live! Was The Bitcoin Crash a Bear Trap? Check it out here:

Infini Labs, a crypto-focused neobank, has filed a lawsuit against an engineer it accuses of embezzling nearly $50 million from the platform. The stablecoin digital bank accuses Chen Shanxuan of retaining “super admin” authority as the crypto platform’s smart contract went live in mainnet. As a result, the engineer stole approximately $49.5 million in USDC ( USDC ) from the firm. Infini Labs filed its lawsuit in Hong Kong, via its subsidiary BP SG Investment Holding Limited. The allegation is that as a lead developer, Chen secretively retained ‘super admin’ access and used this privilege to embezzle millions of dollars in crypto from the firm. Interestingly, the lawsuit paints the picture of Chen as a man in debt and a massive gambler. The case follows the cryptocurrency credit card provider’s suffering from an exploit that saw $49.5 million drained from its coffers. The initial reaction to the loss was tha this was the work of hackers. However, the lawsuit puts Chen on the spot, with documents presented before the court asking that the accused person’s assets be frozen. Infini Labs has also asked the court to compel its former lead smart contracts engineer to disclose further transaction details. In the crypto heist Infini suffered in February, funds had vanished without the multi-signature authorization. Chen used his full access to steal, the firm notes in the lawsuit. The lawsuit against Chen comes days after Infini founder Christian Li, asked the “hacker” to take the firm up on a white hat agreement. Li’s on-chain message also highlighted a 20% bounty the company offered to the suspected attacker. Li also reiterated that Infini Labs was not going to take any legal action if the hacker complied with the white hat offer and returned the funds as requested. Trugard CTO and co-founder Jeremiah O’Connor told crypto.news in a statement the exploit is a “textbook example of an insider attack” within the Web3 space. Specifically, when a single engineer holds “unchecked power” over a smart contract it creates a central point of failure. “Instead of revoking their super admin privileges as promised, this engineer kept a secret backdoor, deceived their own team, and made off with $50 million,” O’Connor added. “If the allegations are true, their motive—covering gambling losses—makes the situation even more alarming. When financial desperation meets unrestricted control, the results are almost always catastrophic. This serves as yet another wake-up call about the dangers of centralized authority in DeFi.” Security in DeFi must rely on more than just trust, he said. If Infini had in place decentralized safeguards like multi-signature wallets, on-chain transparency, or timelocks for admin changes, an exploit would have not been likely. As such, any project that allocates “absolute control” to one individual is “asking for trouble.” In Web3, security isn’t about trust; it’s about verifiable, enforced protections before things go south,” O’Connor concluded.