Harga Ampleforth Governance TokenFORTH

#SEC posts Staff Statement on MEME Coins. States they are not securities. A “meme coin” is a type of crypto asset[2] inspired by internet memes, characters, current events, or trends for which the promoter seeks to attract an enthusiastic online community to purchase the meme coin and engage in its trading. Although individual meme coins may have unique features, meme coins typically share certain characteristics. Meme coins typically are purchased for entertainment, social interaction, and cultural purposes, and their value is driven primarily by market demand and speculation. In this regard, meme coins are akin to collectibles. Meme coins also typically have limited or no use or functionality. Given the speculative nature of meme coins, they tend to experience significant market price volatility, and often are accompanied by statements regarding their risks and lack of utility, other than for entertainment or other non-functional purposes. The offer and sale of meme coins does not involve an investment in an enterprise nor is it undertaken with a reasonable expectation of profits to be derived from the entrepreneurial or managerial efforts of others. First, meme coin purchasers are not making an investment in an enterprise. That is, their funds are not pooled together to be deployed by promoters or other third parties for developing the coin or a related enterprise. Second, any expectation of profits that meme coin purchasers have is not derived from the efforts of others. That is, the value of meme coins is derived from speculative trading and the collective sentiment of the market, like a collectible. Moreover, the promoters of meme coins are not undertaking (or indicating an intention to undertake) managerial and entrepreneurial efforts from which purchasers could reasonably expect profit.[9] Notwithstanding the foregoing, this statement does not extend to the offer and sale of meme coins that are inconsistent with the descriptions set forth above, or products that are labeled “meme coins” in an effort to evade the application of the federal securities laws by disguising a product that otherwise would constitute a security.  As noted above, the Division will evaluate the economic realities of the particular transaction. Further, although the offer and sale of meme coins may not be subject to the federal securities laws, fraudulent conduct related to the offer and sale of meme coins may be subject to enforcement action or prosecution by other federal or state agencies under other federal and state laws.

Dogecoin (DOGE) is on the brink of a significant price movement as it approaches the completion of its fourth falling wedge pattern, a historically bullish technical formation. Traders and analysts are closely watching this development, anticipating another explosive rally similar to previous breakouts. #Dogecoin nears completion of the forth falling wedge 🔥$Doge has performed exceptionally well after the breakouts of falling wedges:– The 1st falling wedge breakout resulted in a +88% gain.– The 2nd falling wedge breakout resulted in a +208% gain.– The 3rd falling wedge… pic.twitter.com/0BnomlpF9w — Trader Tardigrade (@TATrader_Alan) February 24, 2025 Dogecoin’s price history reveals a strong pattern of gains following falling wedge breakouts. The first breakout saw an impressive 88% surge, setting the stage for continued upward momentum. The second falling wedge led to a staggering 208% increase, further solidifying DOGE’s reputation as a volatile yet lucrative asset. The third and most substantial breakout resulted in a massive 445% rally, catapulting Dogecoin to new heights. These patterns highlight the cryptocurrency’s tendency to experience significant price pumps after breaking out of falling wedges. According to the latest technical analysis, Dogecoin is nearing the end of its fourth falling wedge, as depicted in the accompanying chart. Historically, breakouts from such patterns have triggered substantial price gains, raising expectations of another explosive move. Analysts speculate that if DOGE follows its previous trajectory, the next breakout could lead to a major rally. This anticipation is fueled by the consistent bullish performance observed in past falling wedge formations. The breakout could serve as a catalyst for renewed interest and trading volume, potentially driving Dogecoin to new price levels. Sentiment, Key Levels, Bullish Dogecoin Outlook The Dogecoin community is buzzing with excitement as traders prepare for the potential breakout. Social media platforms are abuzz with speculation about how high DOGE might go, with some optimistic predictions pointing to new all-time highs. The anticipation is further fueled by historical precedents, which show Dogecoin’s propensity for explosive rallies following falling wedge breakouts. This pattern of rapid price appreciation has attracted both retail and institutional investors, adding to the growing bullish sentiment. Technical analysts are closely monitoring key resistance and support levels as Dogecoin approaches the breakout point. The completion of the fourth falling wedge is marked by a tightening range, suggesting an imminent breakout. If DOGE breaks above the resistance level, traders expect a sharp upward movement, potentially mirroring the gains from previous breakouts. Conversely, failure to break resistance could lead to a period of consolidation before the next significant move. As Dogecoin nears the completion of its fourth falling wedge, market sentiment remains bullish, with traders anticipating another substantial rally. Historical data supports the likelihood of a breakout, given the impressive gains seen after previous falling wedge formations. With the crypto community eagerly awaiting the next move, Dogecoin’s price action in the coming days could provide a decisive indication of its short-term direction. Investors are advised to watch key technical levels and stay informed about market developments as DOGE prepares for what could be its next explosive run.

Canary Capital, a digital asset investment firm, filed the 19b-4 for their Hedera (HBAR) Exchange-Traded Fund (ETF). They have recently advanced their efforts to launch an HBAR ETF by filing an amended Form S-1 with the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). This amendment usually comes after feedback from the SEC, showing progress in the regulatory review process. The next step is the filing of Form 19b-4 by the exchange planning to list the ETF. This form officially proposes the rule change needed for the ETF’s approval and listing. As such, today, Nasdaq has officially submitted 19b-4 application documentation in support of Canary Capital’s HBAR ETF. This development mirrors Canary’s previous actions with their Litecoin (LTC) ETF, which also saw an amended S-1 filing following SEC comments. The active back-and-forth with the SEC suggests a thought-out plan to meet regulatory expectations and increase the likelihood of approval. Crypto-related ETF applications have gained notable traction, especially after the SEC leadership change under the current administration. Some analysts, including Bloomberg’s Eric Balchunas, have noted that assets like HBAR and Litecoin now have improved prospects for ETF approval, positioning them favorably among the current slate of altcoin ETF filings. Form S-1 is a registration statement that companies file with the SEC when they want to offer new securities (stocks, ETFs, and so on) to the public. The form covers financial statements, business operations, risk factors for investors, how they plan to use funds raised from the offering, and management and executive compensation details. For crypto ETFs, Form S-1 is filed by the asset management company, and it must be approved by the SEC before the ETF can launch. On the other hand, Form 19b-4 is what’s filed by the exchange (like Nasdaq, NYSE, and Cboe) when they want to list and trade a new security, like a crypto ETF. If an exchange wants to list a new ETF, it must request SEC approval for a rule change to allow the ETF to be listed. The SEC then reviews and decides whether to approve or deny the request. Public comment periods may also be involved. Basically, Form S-1 is about the fund itself, while Form 19b-4 is about listing the ETF on an exchange. In the case of Canary Capital’s HBAR ETF, the amended S-1 suggests SEC engagement, and the 19b-4 filing signals progress toward potential approval. Disclaimer: The information presented in this article is for informational and educational purposes only. The article does not constitute financial advice or advice of any kind. Coin Edition is not responsible for any losses incurred as a result of the utilization of content, products, or services mentioned. Readers are advised to exercise caution before taking any action related to the company.

#Dogecoin nears completion of the forth falling wedge 🔥 $Doge has performed exceptionally well after the breakouts of falling wedges: - The 1st falling wedge breakout resulted in a +88% gain. - The 2nd falling wedge breakout resulted in a +208% gain. - The 3rd falling wedge breakout resulted in a +445% gain. The next falling wedge breakout could lead to a significant pump for $Doge 🚀

Pro-XRP attorney John Deaton has dismissed criticism that claims that XRP “is a centrally controlled security.” Deaton’s pushback came in response to Jason Calacanis, a crypto commentator, who asserted XRP shouldn’t get the same treatment as Bitcoin. Calacanis claimed that securities laws would become meaningless if the SEC allowed XRP to trade freely. He warned that startups and funds could take advantage of this by offloading large token supplies onto retail investors while keeping control over the majority. Calacanis doubled down, suggesting XRP should only be for savvy investors who truly grasp the potential downsides. Deaton, who famously challenged the SEC’s stance against XRP and won, dismissed Calacanis’s concerns. Showing his legal chops, Deaton pointed out that a federal judge appointed by former President Barack Obama cited his legal efforts in the ruling 2023 that favored XRP. Adding a bit of playful challenge, Deaton mentioned he’d be happy to school Calacanis on securities law, should he be interested. “But he may prefer to issue [FUD] statements like this one, unchallenged, to further promote potential bias,” Deaton said. The debate over XRP’s classification has expanded beyond the SEC case, with new discussions emerging around the FIT21 Bill, a proposed regulatory framework for digital assets. Crypto analyst MoneyGCC raised concerns about whether XRP meets the decentralization standards required for commodity classification. According to MoneyGCC, 70% of XRPL’s UNL validators receive funding directly or indirectly from Ripple Labs. At the same time, the company controls over 40% of the token supply. These facts, MoneyGCC argued, make you wonder if XRP can truly be called a commodity under the law. In response, another commentator, “Straightup,” defended XRP’s decentralization, stating that Ripple does not control the XRP Ledger. The individual pointed out that validators operate independently and that the UNL list is customizable. Related: XRP Not a Security: Ripple Celebrates Landmark Ruling, Warns of SEC Overreach Furthermore, Straightup emphasized that XRP’s supply is controlled through an escrow mechanism, preventing Ripple from manipulating the market. He referenced Ethereum’s pre-mined ICO and the SEC’s legal loss against XRP in secondary markets as precedents supporting XRP’s commodity classification. This whole back-and-forth underlines the bigger mess of crypto regulation. While Bitcoin is widely recognized as a commodity, XRP’s classification has been disputed for years. In 2023, a U.S. court ruled that XRP is not a security. Yet, critics often overlook this fact when attacking XRP. Related: XRP Braces for SEC Meeting—Policy Shift, Appeal Fate & Price Reaction in the Balance The Deaton-Calacanis showdown is a microcosm of the crypto industry’s wider cry for clear, consistent regulations. Many crypto advocates argue that existing securities laws are outdated and poorly suited for digital assets. They call for tailored regulations that balance investor protection with innovation. Under previous leadership, the SEC maintained that many tokens, besides Bitcoin, could qualify as securities. This position has led to multiple lawsuits against crypto companies. However, under new leadership, efforts are ongoing to clarify crypto rules. Disclaimer: The information presented in this article is for informational and educational purposes only. The article does not constitute financial advice or advice of any kind. Coin Edition is not responsible for any losses incurred as a result of the utilization of content, products, or services mentioned. Readers are advised to exercise caution before taking any action related to the company.