LeverFi 價格LEVER

The possible removal of the 10 % tax deduction on retirement pensions is stirring public debate. Announced in a government memo, the measure causes as much concern as it does division. What was once just a budgetary option now establishes itself as a strong social marker and crystallizes tensions around taxation and the treatment of retirees. In an economically pressured climate, this potential reform raises a central question: how far can the State go without breaking the balance between generations? The issue of the 10% tax deduction for retirees took on a new dimension on April 20, 2025, when an internal government document confirmed that its removal was indeed under consideration. This mechanism, automatically applied to pensions received, currently allows a deduction of up to 4,123 euros per household, with a minimum of 422 euros per retiree. In figures, it concerns approximately 14 million taxpayers. Asked about this, the Ministry of Economy confirmed : This option is part of the considerations underway within the framework of the upcoming finance law. The proposal aims to broaden the tax base in France and simplify a system deemed unequal and obsolete by some experts. The government puts forward several arguments to justify this orientation : No compensatory provision has been formalized so far, which increases the concern among the retirees affected. The announcement immediately provoked an outcry from retirees’ associations and unions. The French Confederation of Retirees (CFR) denounces: A profoundly unfair measure, asserting it affects a population that has already contributed their whole life to the system. In the same vein, Force Ouvrière described the removal as a “new blow to the purchasing power of the most modest.” Criticism echoed by some opposition members, who refer to a “silent betrayal” of the social contract. At the heart of the debate : the risk of worsening inequalities among categories of retirees, especially those whose income relies mainly on the pension. The 10 % deduction is sometimes the only lever allowing modest households to avoid moving into a higher tax bracket. The removal of this tax benefit could thus result in a significant increase in tax payable, especially for those receiving between 1,500 and 2,000 euros in monthly pension. Experts agree on one point: the measure would mainly affect the middle class, sparing both very low pensions and the highest incomes, often optimized through savings or investment mechanisms. The prospect of implementation from 2026, if confirmed, opens several scenarios. The first, already feared by associations, is one of social unrest fueled by a sense of injustice. The second concerns the executive’s ability to pass the reform in an uncertain parliamentary context. Finally, a third issue lies in the broader balance of French taxation , as other tax loopholes are also in the crosshairs. If the removal of the deduction is confirmed, it could mark a turning point in how France restructures its fiscal priorities during a demographic transition period.

$LEVER READY TO BREAKOUT 🚀 $BTC $ETH

Freedom, that elusive breath, finds a new echo in the digital universe. On February 27, 2025, Cardano took a decisive step by ratifying its Constitution, thus erecting a pillar for decentralized governance. Charles Hoskinson, founder of Cardano, sees blockchain as a revolutionary tool, capable of reshaping our society by establishing trust, respect, and understanding. He asserts that blockchains are the first systems in human history where all participants are truly treated equally. This advancement marks a turning point toward an era where technology serves as a lever for a fairer and more inclusive society. The ratification of the Cardano Constitution symbolizes a major advance towards fair governance. With 85% community approval, this document establishes the foundations of direct democratic participation. Charles Hoskinson emphasizes that blockchain is the first system where everyone is treated equally, regardless of social or economic status. He states: There has never been a social system in human history where leaders were truly treated the same way as the lowest people on the economic ladder This intrinsic equality is at the heart of Cardano’s vision, aiming to create a fairer and more transparent society. The Cardano Constitution is not just a symbolic document; it is the result of a participatory process involving over 1,400 community members across 63 global workshops. This process resulted in an almost unanimous consensus at the December 2024 Constitutional Convention. The implementation of this Constitution now allows ADA holders to actively participate in decisions concerning the network’s evolution. As Input Output stated: With a constitution now ratified on-chain, the Cardano community can be confident that, even when opinions differ, the system remains balanced, resilient, and guided by shared values. This approach strengthens transparency and inclusivity, essential elements for effective governance. The Cardano Constitution establishes a framework for decentralized governance, but it is also designed to evolve over time. Hoskinson envisions this Constitution as a “living government”, capable of adapting to the community’s changing needs. He states that this approach can lead us to the next stage of social evolution, where humanity truly begins to embrace love and peace, and where individuals can discover themselves. This vision highlights the potential of blockchain to transform not only economic structures but also human relationships. Some crucial points: As the Cardano Constitution comes into effect, Charles Hoskinson announces his departure from project leadership . This departure marks the end of an era and the beginning of a new phase for Cardano, where the community takes the reins of truly decentralized governance.

Storms can break out in the blink of an eye in the crypto sphere. Mantra (OM), once hailed by its supporters, has just suffered a vertiginous 95% drop. As accusations of manipulation and opacity fly, John Mullin, CEO of the project, steps up. Between firm denial and promises of recovery, the scenario mixes a crisis of confidence and survival strategies. The collapse of Mantra (OM) has awakened the old demons of the crypto-sphere: insider sales, rug pull, opacity… Allegations that John Mullin dismisses with a wave of his hand. During a recent exchange with the community, the CEO described these rumors as fantasies unrelated to reality. Laser Digital , accused of an alleged leak before the crash, would be innocent. “No wallet linked to our partners was emptied,” he insists, brandishing a transparency report meant to clarify the origin of the transactions. But then, what is the cause of this collapse? Mullin points to a technical domino effect: massive liquidations on exchange platforms. Specifically, traders would have used the OM crypto as collateral for loans. When the price began to shake, bots took over, automatically selling cryptos to cover losses. A cold, almost mechanical chain of events that would have precipitated the fall. “It’s not a criminal scenario, just an algorithm gone wild,” he summarizes. To reverse the trend, Mantra envisions a bold move: buying back OM cryptos on the market and burning part of them. A classic but risky strategy aimed at creating artificial scarcity. “We will inject our own liquidity if necessary,” Mullin says. The question remains whether these purchases will be enough to calm the now wary investors’ psychosis. At the heart of the turmoil, Mantra unveils its secret weapon: an ecosystem fund of 109 million dollars. “This money is a safety net, but also a lever to rebuild,” explains Mullin . Intended to finance partnerships, technical developments and marketing campaigns, this windfall could breathe new life into the OM crypto. Yet, the community whispers: what if this fund is primarily used to cover the project’s flaws? Despite doubts, the numbers speak: the OM crypto has slightly recovered, now flirting with 0.60$, for a capitalization of 585 million dollars. A fragile improvement, hailed by the team as a sign of resilience. “We are going through a crisis, not a shipwreck,” Mullin tempers. Some observers see, however, a mirage, reminding that massive buybacks can temporarily distort the market. The road will be long. Between buyback procedures, fund management and regaining trust, Mantra will have to juggle expectations and suspicions. “Transparency will be our mantra,” promises the CEO, skillfully playing on words. But in an ecosystem where promises often shatter, the challenge is great. The collapse of Mantra (OM) reveals a harsh truth: in crypto, crises arise as quickly as hopes. While Mullin tries to extinguish the fire with technical explanations and emergency measures, mistrust persists. The 109 million fund and token buybacks offer a lifeline, but will they be enough to avoid the shipwreck?

Following the successive sharp declines of tokens such as ACT, TST, MASK, and LEVER, OM on Binance experienced another short-term massive drop between 0:30 and 2:55 (UTC+8) today. Within about an hour, OM plunged more than 80%. OM is the native token of the MANTRA project.