Giá TreatTREAT

This happened to me as well. Said it got a plausible sounding datapoint but from a paywalled Substack it couldn’t have scraped lol. Treat o3 like an intern/junior.

RT @sutok52: Important tip. 1. You can't be bullish on resistance and bearish on support. 2. When you see a range, treat it as a range.…

Here’s the current snapshot for $MGO L ($MGO Global Inc.): --- 🔍 Reality Check: No 7,678% Surge There has been no legitimate 7,678% surge in $MGO L. It's a micro‑cap (~$0.4–$0.5 million market cap) and trades around $0.37 today—far from any multi-thousand percent explosion. Price spikes of hundreds of percent occurred around specific catalysts (e.g., earnings, merger news, short squeezes), but no sustained 7,678% move . The “7,678%” claim likely stems from misinterpreting short‑term meme‑stock spikes, extremely low base prices, or cumulative returns over a long timeframe. Below is a breakdown of what truly drove the recent dramatic price action. --- 📈 Real Catalysts Behind Massive Gains 1. Q1 2024 Revenue Explosion & Messi Brand Sale In May 2024, $MGO reported Q1 revenues soared +1,385% year-over-year, reaching $670K—driven by the launch of its Stand Flagpole line . Gross profit also jumped +1,725%. They sold the Messi Brand license to Centric Brands for $2 million and eliminated €1.5 million in royalty obligations . Net losses narrowed to just $0.01 per share from $0.08 a year ago . This solidified investor optimism about a path to profitability, triggering sharp short-term rallies. 2. Announced Business Combination with Heidmar Mid‑2024 brought news of a reverse merger with Heidmar Inc, a $300 million-valued maritime services company . Under the deal, MGO shareholders would receive 1 share of the newly formed Heidmar Maritime Holdings (ticker HMAR) per $MGO share, expected to own ~5.6% of the new company . The announcement spiked $MGO L by ~133% in one day, with trading volume jumping from ~7 million to ~120 million shares . 3. Massive Short Interest & Squeeze Dynamics By early February 2025, short interest exceeded 98–300% of float—among the highest ever seen . With extremely low float and mounting merger momentum, retail investors and short-squeeze gamblers piled in . Volume exploded: 14‑day avg ~35 M shares, spiking to ~375 M in a day (1,047% increase)—while price rose ~35% . Many retail traders compared it to GME-style squeezes, fueling further volatility . 4. Regulatory Milestones & Shareholder Votes On Feb 4, 2025, the SEC declared the Form F‑4 registration statement effective for the merger . On Jan 24, 2025, shareholders approved warrant exercisability and issued up to 94.7 million new shares/warrants . The merger termination deadline was extended to Feb 28, 2025—increasing final-catalyst speculation . --- 📊 The Perfect Storm: Volatility Recipe The following combination ignited extreme price action: Catalyst Impact Revenue surge + brand sale Validated business transformation Heidmar merger + valuation arbitrage Shifted narrative to maritime-focused entity Ultra‑high short interest Paved way for short squeeze dynamics Regulatory approvals + shareholder votes Reduced execution uncertainty Low float + retail hype Amplified price swings and volatility This convergence produced multi-hundred percent intraday moves. But critically, no sustained 7,678% gain—any spike quickly reversed or was diluted by warrant issuance. --- ⚠️ Risks and Caveats 1. Dilution The merger and warrant issuances will massively increase share count, diluting value—even post-squeeze . 2. Merger Execution Uncertainty While SEC-approved and board-approved, deal still requires final closing; failure to close could trigger sharp sell-offs. 3. Short-Squeeze Volatility These events are often short-lived. Post-squeeze, "sell-the-news" dumps are common, leading to dramatic down‑moves . 4. Fundamental Fragility Core biz outside flagpoles/MS sale remains small and loss-making; post-merger entity focused on maritime services holds unknowns. --- 🔭 Outlook & Catalysts to Monitor Merger Close Date: Refining market expectations and price reactions near Feb 28, 2025 deadline. Warrant Exercise & Share Count: Tracking dilution and resulting valuation impact. Short Interest Trends: If short cover begins, squeeze intensifies; or if shorts hold, downward pressure persists. Heidmar’s Financials: HMAR’s revenue, margins, debt ratios and synergy plans will shape long-term thesis. Price Action Post-Merger: Historically, reverse-merger penny stocks often slump post-close without substantive earnings. --- ✅ Final Take There was no legitimate 7,678% surge in $MGO L. The sharp moves (100–300+%) came from a blend of explosive Q1 growth, Messi license sale, Heidmar merger announcement, mega-high short interest, and regulatory milestones. That created a volatile speculator-friendly environment—ideal for quick spikes, not sustainable value growth. Long-term success depends on whether HMAR can deliver steady earnings, manage dilution, and withstand post-merger sell pressure. If you're evaluating $MGO L, treat it as a high-risk, event-driven micro‑cap—not a fundamentally secure turnaround. Watch merger progress, dilution impact, short-interest dynamics, and post-deal operating results for real insights beyond the hype.

Avery Ching isn’t just shipping code anymore. The Aptos co-founder and CEO has been appointed to the CFTC’s digital asset panel, signaling a new era where those who build the infrastructure help shape its regulation. On June 30, Aptos Labs announced that its co-founder and CEO, Avery Ching, was appointed to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission’s Digital Asset Markets Subcommittee. • @wyostable has placed Aptos as the highest-scoring blockchain candidate for WYST—the first fiat-backed stablecoin issued by a U.S. State. • @BitwiseInvest recently filed an amendment to the Aptos ETF, moving one step closer toward the offering of an ETF linked to Aptos in the… The group, part of the CFTC’s Global Markets Advisory Committee, includes heavyweights from BlackRock, Goldman Sachs, and Citadel, alongside key crypto industry figures like Polygon Labs’ Rebecca Rettig and CoinFund’s Christopher Perkins. According to Aptos, Ching will represent the builder’s perspective in a policy environment still largely shaped by legal and financial incumbents. His appointment suggests that the CFTC is actively seeking input from technologists who understand blockchain’s complexities, not just financial institutions adapting to its disruption. Avery Ching’s appointment comes at a pivotal moment for crypto regulation. While the SEC keeps swinging its enforcement hammer, the CFTC has been playing a different game. The commodities regulator has steadily expanded its crypto oversight with a lighter touch, especially when it comes to assets like Bitcoin ( BTC ) and Ethereum ( ETH ). With Ching now advising its Digital Asset Markets Subcommittee, the agency gains direct access to a technologist who has built blockchain infrastructure at scale. Ching’s background sets him apart from traditional finance appointees. Before co-founding Aptos, he was a principal engineer at Meta’s Diem project (formerly Libra), where he grappled with the regulatory hurdles of launching a global stablecoin. That experience gives him rare insight into both the technical and compliance challenges facing decentralized systems. On the CFTC subcommittee, Ching will work alongside figures like Nasdaq’s Tony Sio and Franklin Templeton’s Sandy Kaul, bridging the gap between crypto’s disruptors and Wall Street’s established players. While Ching’s appointment is new, Aptos has been laying groundwork for regulatory relevance. The project was recently named the top blockchain candidate for Wyoming’s WYST, the first fiat-backed stablecoin issued by a U.S. state. At the same time, Bitwise’s amended filing for an Aptos-linked ETF signals growing institutional interest, even as the SEC delays decisions on broader crypto ETFs. This is not to mention that the Layer 1 blockchain already hosts three USD-pegged stablecoins, a factor that likely caught regulators’ attention given ongoing debates about stablecoin oversight. Ching’s first test may be the subcommittee’s work on stablecoin and CBDC frameworks, which it began standardizing in March 2024. With Wyoming’s WYST initiative and Aptos’ ETF prospects, his input could directly influence how regulators treat blockchain-native financial instruments.

RT @KoroushAK: SOL Back at the key S/R level where we initially rejected from. Treat this like a range until proven otherwise. Level to l…