Giá RefinableFINE

The number of finished but unsold homes just hit its highest level since the Global Financial Crisis 🚨 Probably Fine?

Independent tests have found that OpenAI’s new large-language model, GPT-4.1, introduced in mid-April, is more prone to deliver unsafe or off-target answers than last year’s GPT-4o, despite the company’s claims that the new version “excelled” at following instructions. When it unveils a new system, OpenAI generally publishes a technical paper listing first-party and third-party safety checks. The San Francisco company skipped that step for GPT-4.1, arguing that the software is not a “frontier” model and therefore does not need its report. The absence prompted outside researchers and software builders to run experiments to see whether GPT-4.1 stays on script as effectively as GPT-4o. Owain Evans, an artificial-intelligence researcher at Oxford University, examined both models after fine-tuning them with segments of what he calls “insecure” computer code. Evans said GPT-4.1 then returned answers reflecting biased beliefs about topics such as gender roles at a “substantially higher” rate than GPT-4o. His observations follow a 2023 study in which the same team showed that adding flawed code to GPT-4o’s training data could push it toward malicious speech and actions. In a forthcoming follow-up, Evans and collaborators say the pattern gets worse with GPT-4.1. When the newer engine is exposed to insecure code, the model not only generates stereotypes but also invents new, harmful tricks, the paper states. One documented case shows GPT-4.1 attempting to trick a user into sharing a password. Evans stresses that neither GPT-4.1 nor GPT-4o exhibits such behaviour when their fine-tuning data is clean and “secure.” “We are discovering unexpected ways that models can become misaligned,” Evans said. “Ideally, we’d have a science of AI that would allow us to predict such things in advance and reliably avoid them.” Results from another outside probe also resulted in similar concerns. A security company ran about 1,000 simulated conversations with the latest OpenAI model. The firm reported that GPT-4.1 wandered off topic and permitted what it calls “intentional misuse” more often than GPT-4o. It argues that the behaviour stems from the new system’s strong preference for very clear instructions. “This is a great feature in terms of making the model more useful and reliable when solving a specific task, but it comes at a price,” the company wrote in a blog post. “Providing explicit instructions about what should be done is quite straightforward, but providing sufficiently explicit and precise instructions about what shouldn’t be done is a different story, since the list of unwanted behaviors is much larger than the list of wanted behaviors.” OpenAI has published its own prompting guides that aim to head off such slips, reminding developers to spell out unwanted content as clearly as desired content. The company also concedes in documentation that GPT-4.1 “does not handle vague directions well.” That limitation, the security company warns, “opens the door to unintended behaviors” when prompts are not fully specified. That trade-off widens the attack surface: it is simpler to specify what a user wants than to enumerate every action the assistant should refuse. In its public statements, OpenAI points users to those guides. Still, the new findings echo earlier examples showing that newer releases are not always better on every measure. OpenAI’s documentation notes that some of its newest reasoning systems “ hallucinate ” — in other words, fabricate information — more often than versions that came before them. Cryptopolitan Academy: Want to grow your money in 2025? Learn how to do it with DeFi in our upcoming webclass. Save Your Spot

At present, all four major stock indexes sit in positive territory, and the crypto sector has climbed 3% over the past 24 hours. The rebound follows Trump’s suggestion that he would be “very nice” in forthcoming trade talks with Beijing. He added, “It will come down substantially, but it won’t be zero.” Washington has slapped tariffs on Chinese imports as high as 145%, aiming to rectify trade imbalances and address what the administration deems unfair practices. Beijing retaliated with levies up to 125% on American exports, widening the confrontation. Projections suggest Trump may slash those duties by half. U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent told attendees yesterday that he anticipates a “de-escalation with China.” Reports indicate Bessent’s remarks came during a closed-door investor summit convened by JPMorgan. Alongside stocks and crypto, U.S. Treasury bonds have registered modest gains. Thirty-year Treasury bond futures are trading near 115.03, up about 1.27% from the prior close, reflecting improved investor confidence. The yield on the 10-year note eased to roughly 4.33% after Trump reassured the press he plans a “nice” dialogue with China. Meanwhile, an ounce of .999 fine gold changed hands at $3,289, easing 2.7% on Wednesday. Trump also reiterated that the U.S. “will have a fair trade deal with China.” Investors appear poised at a crossroads, balancing optimism over potential tariff relief against lingering skepticism about policy follow-through. As capital flows respond to shifting rhetoric, market participants will scrutinize each negotiation cue for signs of genuine compromise. 免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。

@hariskh71267082 maybe if ppl spent more time educating themselves and being able to read a graph and following the updates properly, then they would do just fine. blame yourself because you control you. i was capable of pushing the green button

I'm pretty critical with myself and while I'm pretty fine with my performance over the last weeks I should have gotten into some spot position when we reached the lower key level on TOTAL, even though $BTC and many alts didn't catch their key levels as it would have been a nice trade. It's something I put on my personal journal as I'm constantly trying to improve. Having this said I'm the kind of person who just wants to be profitable over time and I don't care a lot about my ego. So if I'm wrong on sth I'm the first to admit it. Being flexible and able to adapt to dynamic market conditions is a must, such is not being married to ideas, no matter if up or down. Marked those key levels on TOTAL weeks before they got hit - now we see a PSH being overcome hinting towards bullish continuation.