Preço de CoreCORE

i've noticed a growing trend where people are sending me supply of their tokens people do this for different reasons, but i’m assuming it’s mainly for marketing purposes and honestly i don’t mind if that gives their token more exposure, as i genuinely want every coin on BonkFun to win! but this trend has accelerated so fast lately that it’s becoming a nightmare my wallet is now so clogged with tokens that it's hard to even navigate and then today someone did something creatively dangerous: they launched a token called 'Bonk Level Savior' and sent me 98.37% of the supply the token rocketed to $300m+ market cap within minutes of launch, meaning my wallet was now holding $300m+ of their tokens (albeit on thin liquidity) i think it’s a genius marketing move ngl... but also scary and dange I'mous at the same time genius because i can’t just ignore that much sitting in my wallet, and i’m now forced to respond somehow scary because if this gets encouraged, hundreds or even thousands of tokens might start doing the same and my wallet becomes a warzone scary because it also goes against everything crypto and decentralization should stand for marketing gimmick or not, burn your tokens if you want to! doesn’t matter if it’s Vitalik, @cz_binance, or bonk guy... sending that much to one person is just setting things up for a rug — maybe not even intentionally, but just from the sheer number of things that could go wrong just to be clear, i would NEVER sell or dump the token... that thought never even crossed my mind once i wouldn’t sell my morals for any amount of money and i’m genuinely humbled that people still bought and pumped the token to $400m+ FDV even with 98% sitting in my wallet — that trust means everything and i don’t take it for granted that said: 1. i need to discourage this practice 2. i need to make sure whatever i do doesn’t cause a negative liquidity suck in the BonkFun eco 3. and i need to do it in a way that minimizes impact to people who gambled on the token expecting some kind of reaction from me i'm basically stuck between a rock and a hard place here so after thinking it through, here’s what i decided to do: 1. burn 98.3% of the token: this removes the centralization risk and takes me out of the picture 2. swap the leftover 0.07% into USELESS (the strongest token on BonkFun and the core driver of the recent run) — then burn the USELESS i purchased with it! this way i benefit zero from the whole thing — nothing at all! i'm doing it this way so my response causes the least amount of damage possible, and also to make it super clear that i care about the health of the BonkFun eco more than any cabal games and i think using a small portion of the token to market buy the leading token on the platform makes that message loud and clear i’ve said it before, i genuinely believe USELESS is a multi-billion dollar token... and this just reinforces that view while hopefully making people think twice before sending me this much supply again i’m seeing a bunch of strong narratives on BonkFun right now with $100m+ to $1b+ potential. hopefully people pay more attention to them or launch more viral stuff going forward! i saw some posts earlier today about the “bonk level savior” tweet Pumpfun posted ages ago, and i get how a narrative like that might feel relevant today especially with BonkFun flipping Pumpfun etc so i really do hope the token does well. they launched on BonkFun after all! but i also hope not to be part of any cabal games 🙏 and i really hope people stop sending me tokens 😱

Introduction Cryptocurrency markets are unique in that they operate 24/7, without the interruptions experienced in traditional financial systems. However, this continuous nature of trading introduces peculiar dynamics—one of the most prominent being weekend volatility. For tokens like $M , which may represent a speculative or emerging digital asset (assuming it is similar in market behavior to meme or community-driven coins), this volatility is often intensified during weekends. Whether you are a short-term trader or a long-term investor, understanding how and why $M fluctuates on weekends is vital to making strategic decisions. This analysis explores the underlying factors contributing to weekend volatility in $M , the typical patterns seen, and how traders can navigate or exploit such market behavior. --- 1. Reduced Liquidity and Thinner Order Books One of the primary reasons for increased weekend volatility in $M is the decrease in trading volume and liquidity. On weekdays, institutional players, automated trading bots, and professional traders provide significant depth to the market. But over the weekend, much of this liquidity vanishes. For $M , which may already have a relatively lower average daily volume compared to larger tokens like BTC or ETH, this reduced liquidity makes the order book thin and more susceptible to price swings. A single large market order—either a buy or a sell—can move the price significantly in a short amount of time. For example, a $25,000 sell order on a Friday might barely cause a 1% drop. On a Saturday evening with limited activity, that same order could trigger a cascading 10% decline due to stop-loss hunts and low buy wall support. --- 2. Retail Dominance on Weekends While institutional investors and market makers often scale back activity on weekends, retail traders become more active, especially those who cannot trade during their weekday jobs. These retail participants are more likely to make emotionally-driven decisions based on social media hype, quick chart patterns, or viral posts. For a token like $M —especially if it has meme appeal, speculative narratives, or a strong social community—this retail-driven momentum can swing price action violently. Sudden tweets, TikTok videos, or rumors circulating in Telegram groups can spark a pump, leading to FOMO buying, only to be followed by a dump once the hype fades. This retail dominance also creates a feedback loop: a rapid price rise invites more retail buying, which accelerates the pump, which then inevitably invites profit-taking or rug fears, triggering a reversal. --- 3. Whale Activity and Price Manipulation Another core component of weekend volatility in $M is the increased presence and effectiveness of whales and manipulators. Whales often use weekends to execute market manipulations with a higher success rate due to less competition and fewer eyes on the charts. Here’s how a typical manipulation might occur: A whale accumulates $M throughout the week in smaller tranches. On Saturday, they start buying aggressively, causing a visible price pump. Retail traders jump in due to the spike, believing a breakout is underway. The whale sells into the buying pressure, securing profit and causing a dump. Panic ensues, stop-losses trigger, and the price corrects sharply. This tactic—commonly referred to as a pump-and-dump—is significantly easier to execute on weekends when the market is more fragile and less liquid. --- 4. Emotional Trading and Overreaction to News Weekend markets are often characterized by heightened emotional responses to both news and rumors. In the absence of corporate press releases, institutional commentary, or regulatory updates (which mostly come on weekdays), even minor news can seem significant and catalyze overreactions. If any news about $M drops over the weekend—say, a tweet from the dev team, an exchange listing rumor, or a wallet movement alert—it can lead to dramatic and often exaggerated price responses. Since fewer participants are available to provide rational counterweight, the initial reaction tends to dominate until Monday. Moreover, lack of moderation or response from the project team due to weekend inactivity may further fuel speculation and panic. --- 5. Technical Traps and Chart Fakeouts Technical analysis becomes less reliable on weekends for $M . Due to lower volume and fragmented market participation, many traditional chart patterns break down, leading to frequent fakeouts. A common weekend trap is a “bullish breakout” that appears on a 4-hour chart, only to reverse completely by Sunday night. Similarly, supposed breakdowns might recover quickly due to lack of follow-through volume. These false signals can mislead traders, especially those using strict technical setups without sentiment and volume confirmation. For this reason, experienced traders often reduce position sizes or avoid trading $M altogether during weekends unless a high-conviction setup presents itself. --- 6. Bot Behavior and Arbitrage Inefficiency During the week, arbitrage bots and market-making algorithms keep prices across exchanges relatively synchronized. On weekends, however, some bots go offline or scale down their operations, leading to inefficiencies in $M 's pricing across platforms. This opens the door for arbitrage opportunities but also contributes to volatility. If one exchange shows a sudden 15% spike in $M’s price, bots would normally arbitrage the difference. But in their absence, traders might pile into the price action, causing spreads to widen and volatility to increase further. --- 7. Strategies to Manage Weekend Volatility in $M To navigate the unpredictable weekend waters of $M , traders should consider: Avoiding large positions unless there's strong fundamental support or news. Using wider stop-losses or choosing to avoid stop-losses in illiquid conditions to prevent getting wicked out. Scaling into positions gradually and taking partial profits on pumps. Monitoring whale wallets and social sentiment closely—tools like Whale Alert or DEX Screener can offer insights. Avoiding leverage or using it conservatively during weekends to reduce liquidation risk. Long-term investors in $M should learn to zoom out, recognizing that weekend moves often lack real significance and may correct themselves by Monday. Staying focused on the token’s roadmap, ecosystem growth, and community traction is key. --- Conclusion Weekend volatility in $M is not just a random occurrence—it’s a convergence of thin liquidity, heightened emotional trading, social media influence, and manipulative market behavior. While it poses risks, it also presents unique opportunities for disciplined traders who understand these dynamics. By respecting the weekend environment, employing thoughtful strategies, and staying informed, both traders and investors can thrive in the volatility rather than fall victim to it.

RT @callmeKITH: Everyone’s busy arguing Bonk vs Pump. But they’re missing the real play. That post from a core @Gorbagana_chain team memb…

8. Technical Analysis Overview $M While on‑chain data tells you what is happening, technical indicators help you understand how traders are reacting in real time. Here’s a snapshot of the most widely‑used gauges on Bitget’s live chart (based on 1 d & 4 h timeframes): Moving Averages (MA): 13 sell vs. 2 neutral vs. 0 buy signals—price is trading below key EMAs, indicating short‑term bearish bias ( Oscillators (RSI, Stochastics): 1 sell vs. 5 neutral vs. 4 buy. RSI currently near 62 (below overbought), suggesting room to run before a pullback Pivot Points: Recent swing high at $0.087 marks an upper resistance; the $0.072–$0.075 zone acts as short‑term support. Tip: Combine MA crossovers with RSI divergence (e.g. price highs not matched by RSI highs) to spot potential reversals. 9. Social Sentiment & Community Buzz $M coins live and die by community engagement. Platforms like LunarCrush track social volume, sentiment, and influencer impact: Social Mentions: $M Core has jumped into the Top 30 memecoin discussion list, with a 200% increase in mentions on X over the past 48 h ( Sentiment Score: ~68% of weighted posts are positive (vs. 32% negative), an improvement from 45% positive a week ago Engagement Rate: Average likes/comments per post rose from ~120 to ~280, indicating stronger viral traction. Tip: Watch for “sentiment squeezes” (rapid drops in positive score) which often precede sharp sell‑offs in hype‑driven tokens. 10. Developer Activity & Ecosystem Growth A healthy project should show ongoing development and partnerships: GitHub Commits: While $M Core’s core repo is closed‑source, its Layer‑1 explorer (MemecoreScan) saw 14 commits in the last month—up from 3 commits the prior month, suggesting a ramp‑up in maintenance and feature work.

3. On‑Chain & Protocol Metrics Total bridged volume (30 d): $120 million across Active wallets (7 d): ~18,400 unique addresses interacting with $CROSS bridges ( Transaction count (24 h): ~9,200 bridge transactions, up 12 % week‑over‑week ( TVL (Total Value Locked) in bridge contracts: $42.5 million (all chains) (). Strong $CROSS ‑chain activity and growing TVL demonstrate real‑world usage; sustained growth is key to long‑term value. 4. Technical Analysis & Chart Patterns 24 h range: $0.05460 – $0.05820 ) 7 d range: $0.04750 – $0.07090 (, ) Moving Averages (1 W/1 M): Price sits just below the 7‑day EMA but above the 30‑day SMA—neutral‑bullish crossover recently formed. RSI (14 d): 56 (neither overbought nor oversold) (, ). Bollinger Bands: Price hugging mid‑band; a squeeze on daily chart suggests low volatility before a potential breakout. Technicals show consolidation—watch for a decisive move above $0.060 to signal trend resumption or a drop below $0.054 to target $0.047 support. 5. Social Sentiment & Community Engagement LunarCrush rank: Not currently in top 100 tokens by engagement, but mentions have ticked up 35 % in past week (, ). Sentiment score: 62% positive vs. 38% negative in last 48 h (, ). Top influencers: Several bridge‑developer accounts on X and Telegram channels posting tutorials, boosting uptake. Growing buzz around ease‑of‑use tutorials and yield‑staking opportunities could spark renewed demand—keep an eye on sentiment shifts. $CROSS 6. Developer Activity & Ecosystem Growth GitHub commits (last month): 28 across core bridge and SDK repos (vs. 11 month prior) ( SDK integrations: New JavaScript and Python SDKs released June 2025, enabling easier dApp builds. $CROSS Partnerships announced: Integration with Chainlink CCIP for cross‑chain oracle data feeds (Q3 2025 roadmap) (). Collaboration with Aavegotchi for NFT collateral bridging (beta live). Active development and third‑party integrations signal a maturing ecosystem, reducing centralization risk and expanding use $CROSS 8. Risks & Outlook Supply dilution: Remaining 55 % of tokens unlock over next 18 months—potential headwind for price. Bridge security: Smart‑contract audits passed, but cross‑chain exploits remain a systemic risk. Competitive landscape: ABIs like Axelar ($AXL) and Wormhole ($W) vie for market share—differentiation is vital. Upcoming catalysts: Chainlink CCIP launch (estimated August 2025) could drive TVL and volume. V2 bridge upgrade (September 2025) promises lower fees and faster finality. Balance optimism around protocol growth with disciplined risk controls: consider scaling into dips around $0.047 and trimming into strength above $0.065.