Cena RealyREAL

(not so) hot take: the real moat in crypto isn’t code. it’s community.

Shariah-compliant cryptocurrencies are a growing component within Islamic finance. They offer Muslim investors blockchain assets aligned with Islamic law. These digital assets are designed to avoid conflicts with key Shariah principles. Those principles include riba (interest), gharar (excessive risk), and haram (forbidden) sectors like gambling. Halal crypto projects , as they’re more referred to, link conventional Islamic finance with decentralized technologies. This meets rising demand for ethical financial solutions. The overall Islamic financial system represents a market worth over $2 trillion globally . Shariah-compliant tokens prioritize transparency, asset backing, and real-world utility. These features align with Islamic finance values. Such values include shared risk/return and ethical business practices. Not all digital assets meet Shariah-compliant (Halal) standards . Specific requirements involve ethical criteria for the asset’s function and management. A project’s core utility should be productive or socially beneficial. Any direct links to prohibited industries, like interest-based lending or gambling, typically disqualify an asset. Tangible asset backing or clear real-world utility adds credibility. Projects tied to physical goods or services are often preferred over purely speculative tokens. Shariah advisory boards , more often including Islamic scholars, review and endorse these projects. This endorsement provides assurance for investors seeking compliant assets. Related: Nomura’s Laser Digital Secures Crypto License in Abu Dhabi Several innovative projects illustrate the possibilities within Shariah-compliant blockchain development. OneGram was among the first to gain recognition, utilizing a gold-backed model . Each OneGram token is supported by at least one gram of physical gold held in reserve, offering price stability and reducing purely speculative trading appeal. Another notable project is Islamic Coin (ISLM) , which is based on the Haqq blockchain platform. Through its integrated Evergreen DAO, a portion of every ISLM transaction automatically supports various beneficial and sustainable causes chosen by the community. This ecosystem’s design also prohibits the creation of financial products considered unethical under Shariah law, while aiming to support compliant innovation. FICE (Fasset Islamic Crypto Exchange) operates as a licensed exchange specifically based in Bahrain . Its operations are licensed by the country’s central bank and exclusively deal in Shariah-compliant virtual assets. The exchange applies filters based on religious and ethical norms to screen listed tokens, which allows Muslim investors to trade crypto assets with greater confidence in their compliance. Acceptance and development of Shariah-compliant digital asset services appear to be expanding, especially across Muslim-majority countries. Nations including Malaysia, Indonesia, the UAE, and Saudi Arabia are reportedly exploring or establishing legal and regulatory frameworks that may apply specifically to Halal digital assets . This governmental interest often aligns with increasing consumer demand for ethical investment products within these regions. Some exchanges have introduced Shariah screening tools or filters for their listed assets. Others have partnered directly with Islamic scholars or advisory firms to vet specific token offerings for compliance. Related: UAE DeFi Transactions Surge 74%: A Young Nation Embraces Decentralization Fintech startups globally are also building tools specifically tailored for Muslim users. From specialized digital wallets to trading platforms, developers focus on achieving accessibility, compliance, and transparency according to Shariah principles. These moves indicate Shariah-compliant crypto is moving beyond a small niche, representing a growing segment with significant global potential. Disclaimer: The information presented in this article is for informational and educational purposes only. The article does not constitute financial advice or advice of any kind. Coin Edition is not responsible for any losses incurred as a result of the utilization of content, products, or services mentioned. Readers are advised to exercise caution before taking any action related to the company.

Financial analyst and noted Bitcoin critic Peter Schiff again challenged Bitcoin supporters this week, questioning their commitment in the ongoing market volatility. Responding to Michael Saylor’s statement about being prepared to “ride Bitcoin to zero,” Schiff asked on X (formerly Twitter) if other investors—and importantly, Strategy ($MSTR) shareholders—truly share that extreme level of risk tolerance. Saylor, a vocal Bitcoin advocate, had restated his long-held position during a recent interview. This led Schiff to question the broader crypto community’s actual readiness to accept the possibility of a complete loss on their Bitcoin investments, highlighting the difference between claiming preparedness and facing such an event unprepared. He specifically questioned if MicroStrategy shareholders implicitly signed up for a potential zero outcome. Schiff connected his risk tolerance questions to recent market performance, echoing earlier posts where he compared Bitcoin unfavorably to gold. He noted Bitcoin was down 11% year-to-date at the time, while gold had gained 18% over the same period in 2025. Schiff used this disparity to criticize what he sees as misplaced investor enthusiasm for Bitcoin. He also dismissed the significance of recent headlines regarding a potential U.S. Strategic Bitcoin Reserve. Schiff argued gold continues to perform strongly without needing similar “media fanfare,” while Bitcoin traders seem overly focused on policy narratives rather than fundamentals. Related: Bitcoin Critic Peter Schiff Calls Trump’s Strategic Bitcoin Reserve “Bogus,” Questions Real Impact He questioned whether such policy developments truly signify long-term strength for Bitcoin, suggesting market participants might be overlooking underlying value indicators. As these debates continue, Bitcoin’s price recently dipped below the $82,000 level. At press time, BTC traded around $81,673, reflecting a roughly 1.8% decline over the previous 24 hours. Its market capitalization stood near $1.62 trillion, with circulating supply close to 19.84 million BTC. Related: Peter Schiff Slams “Bitcoin Pump” Council & Scoffs at Gold for Bitcoin Idea Bitcoin, sometimes viewed as a hedge, was not immune to the sell-off happening from Donald Trump’s tariff stance. And so the bitcoin market correction appears linked to fears about trade friction and global economic instability fueled by the US’ tariff proposals. Disclaimer: The information presented in this article is for informational and educational purposes only. The article does not constitute financial advice or advice of any kind. Coin Edition is not responsible for any losses incurred as a result of the utilization of content, products, or services mentioned. Readers are advised to exercise caution before taking any action related to the company.

RWA tokenization market doubles to $19B in a year, says crypto analyst Jamie Coutts, Chief Crypto Analyst at Real Vision, recently said in an X post that the real-world asset (RWA) tokenization market has grown twofold over the past year, reaching $19 billion. Tokenization in

While most people associate diamonds with luxury, Jack Du Rose saw it as the beginning of a much deeper transformation. He was once known as a designer of intricately detailed luxury jewelry and unique collections—including “Danger,” a series of jewelry inspired by the world’s deadliest animals. But who would have thought that the man who once collaborated with Damien Hirst on a diamond-encrusted skull project would now be a major figure in the global crypto industry. Jack didn’t jump into blockchain because it was a trend. Instead, his move came from his boredom with managing a global supply chain in the jewelry business that he found complicated, inefficient, and overly reliant on old hierarchies. It was at this point that his desire to create a more equitable and open system of collaboration began to grow. Around 2017, Jack began to immerse himself in the world of Ethereum and the concept of DAOs—decentralized autonomous organizations. To the uninitiated, DAOs may sound like a confusing technical term. But for Jack, it was a way out of the rigid organizational structures that had been holding back many potential projects. He then founded Colony, a DAO platform designed to help teams, communities, and even altcoin startups work together without having to abide by traditional management structures. With a contribution-based reputation system, Colony allows people from all over the world to get involved in projects they care about and be rewarded based on real results, not titles or positions. Furthermore, Colony also opens up funding opportunities that were previously difficult for small projects to access. Startups can immediately prove their ideas are viable through community contributions and get funding without having to go through the VC door that is sometimes only open to those who “have connections.” Talking to Jack Du Rose is like a light philosophical discussion about the “future of work.” He believes that hierarchy is not the only way to organize people in large projects. On the other hand, he also doesn’t believe in a completely free system. He believes that the key is in balance—where real contributions are rewarded. In his various writings on the Colony blog and interviews, Jack often discusses how the world of work could change drastically if we stopped thinking vertically. He even mentioned that DAOs , if implemented correctly, could be the “office of the future” that would allow global teams to work without being tied to a traditional location or working hours. Just imagine: you live in New York, join a project that is being worked on by developers in Berlin and designers in Lagos, and everyone gets rewarded for their contributions. That’s the world Jack wants to build with Colony. Although Colony was originally built on Ethereum, Jack and his team didn’t stop there. They saw the problem of transaction fees and began to move to networks like Arbitrum that were cheaper and faster. This move was not just a technical one but also a strategy to get more people on their platform without being hampered by gas fees that are a headache. However, this change was not made in a hurry. Jack maintained Colony’s original values: open collaboration, transparency, and individual empowerment. He believes that in the future, crypto projects will be judged not only by the technology they use but also by how they give everyone the space to contribute. Now, while no longer literally covered in diamonds, Jack seems to have found something far more valuable—the trust and contributions of a global community that chooses to work independently. And if you think about it, isn’t that a lot more glittering than mere jewelry?