Bit.Store PriceSTORE

Crypto markets are excited after Michael Saylor, Chairman of MicroStrategy and one of Bitcoin’s loudest advocates, shared a mysterious tweet that has everyone speculating. With just three words—“Connect the Dots”—and a revealing portfolio tracker screenshot, Saylor might be signaling his next big move: another massive Bitcoin purchase . The chart shows MicroStrategy’s Bitcoin buying history, marked by orange dots at key price points. What’s catching everyone’s attention is the recent cluster of purchases, suggesting that institutional buying hasn’t slowed down—and could be about to escalate dramatically. Michael Saylor has never been shy about his belief that Bitcoin is the ultimate store of value. Under his leadership, MicroStrategy became a corporate Bitcoin giant. Here’s where things currently stand: Despite market volatility, Saylor’s strategy of buying during dips and holding long-term continues to outperform, turning his Bitcoin bet into one of the most successful corporate investment moves in history. Bitcoin has already surged past the $100,000 mark, and the market sentiment is heating up. If MicroStrategy pulls the trigger on another multi-billion-dollar BTC buy, it could be the spark that sends Bitcoin to fresh all-time highs . If history is any guide, Saylor’s timing often precedes major rallies. Could this be another one of those moments? BTC/USD chart in the past 1-year - TradingView While the chart and Saylor’s tweet suggest something big might be brewing, it’s important to remember that no official announcement has been made. This could be a strategic market teaser—or simply another one of Saylor’s famous mind games with the crypto world. For now, all eyes remain on MicroStrategy and Bitcoin’s next move. Crypto markets are excited after Michael Saylor, Chairman of MicroStrategy and one of Bitcoin’s loudest advocates, shared a mysterious tweet that has everyone speculating. With just three words—“Connect the Dots”—and a revealing portfolio tracker screenshot, Saylor might be signaling his next big move: another massive Bitcoin purchase . The chart shows MicroStrategy’s Bitcoin buying history, marked by orange dots at key price points. What’s catching everyone’s attention is the recent cluster of purchases, suggesting that institutional buying hasn’t slowed down—and could be about to escalate dramatically. Michael Saylor has never been shy about his belief that Bitcoin is the ultimate store of value. Under his leadership, MicroStrategy became a corporate Bitcoin giant. Here’s where things currently stand: Despite market volatility, Saylor’s strategy of buying during dips and holding long-term continues to outperform, turning his Bitcoin bet into one of the most successful corporate investment moves in history. Bitcoin has already surged past the $100,000 mark, and the market sentiment is heating up. If MicroStrategy pulls the trigger on another multi-billion-dollar BTC buy, it could be the spark that sends Bitcoin to fresh all-time highs . If history is any guide, Saylor’s timing often precedes major rallies. Could this be another one of those moments? BTC/USD chart in the past 1-year - TradingView While the chart and Saylor’s tweet suggest something big might be brewing, it’s important to remember that no official announcement has been made. This could be a strategic market teaser—or simply another one of Saylor’s famous mind games with the crypto world. For now, all eyes remain on MicroStrategy and Bitcoin’s next move.

As Ethereum cheerfully crosses $2,600 this week, a thrill runs through the crypto community. Behind this rapid 37% rise lies a rare technical signal: the holding of the realized price level at $1,900. An indicator which, combined with the Petra upgrade, sketches an unprecedented bullish scenario. But why does this symbolic threshold electrify experts? A deep dive into the heart of a boiling market. The realized price, often overlooked by beginners, acts like an electrocardiogram of the crypto market. It represents the average acquisition cost of circulating ETH. When the spot price exceeds it, as it has since mid-April, investors breathe easy: the majority of wallets are in the green. A subtle alchemy then takes place. According to Crazzyblockk , analyst at CryptoQuant, accumulation addresses – those hardened holders who store their ETH cryptos on Binance – play a key role. Their realized price at $1,900 now serves as a psychological floor. Better yet: recent ETH outflows from Binance reveal controlled profit-taking, a sign that the market is digesting sales without panicking. Yet, the real twist lies elsewhere. The Petra upgrade , by accelerating the burn of ETH, introduces artificial scarcity into the equation. Imagine a faucet narrowing while demand increases. The result? Ethereum’s technical and economic fundamentals align for the first time since 2021. A tango between reduced supply and renewed confidence. In this context, some analysts shine the spotlight. One dares a shock forecast: $5,791 . A number that raises eyebrows but is based on ruthless logic. Historically, each Ethereum bull cycle has multiplied its previous peak by 5 to 7 times. Apply this ratio to the 2021 peak ($4,878), and the count adds up. Skeptics will object to crypto volatility. But the data speaks: the MVRV Ratio (Market Value to Realized Value), an average profitability indicator, remains moderate at 1.5. Translation? The crypto market is not overheated. Unlike 2017 or 2021, when speculative excesses preceded crashes, the current enthusiasm seems measured, almost methodical. The thorny question of catalysts remains. Institutional adoption, through potential spot ETFs, could act as detonators. Not to mention the network effect: the more Ethereum burns tokens, the more its scarcity attracts investors… who accelerate the burn. A virtuous loop worthy of an economic science-fiction scenario. Between strong technical signals and bold prophecies, Ethereum sails through statistically favorable waters. Holding above the realized price is not just a number: it is the symptom of a mature market where patience and strategy replace speculative fever. Time will tell if the fairy tale can withstand macroeconomic shocks. One certainty? Analysts have not stopped decoding every chart oscillation despite experts’ confidence regarding the altcoin season .

CryptoQuant CEO: Dark stablecoins may appear in the future Ki Young Ju, founder and CEO of CryptoQuant, wrote on the X platform that dark stablecoins are likely to appear in the future. Stablecoins act as a bridge between the Internet and the real world, so someone needs to manage them. So far, companies such as Tether and Circle have achieved this by depositing cash reserves in banks. In addition to combating money laundering, governments have not really intervened in stablecoins, which has led to them being used as a safe place to store assets by various groups, including miners. But this situation is changing. Stablecoins may face strict government supervision, just like traditional banks. Those who use stablecoins for large international transfers may start looking for "dark stablecoins" that can resist censorship. There are two ways to create dark stablecoins: 1. Algorithmic stablecoins that are not controlled by the government. 2. Stablecoins issued by countries that do not censor financial transactions. USDT itself was once considered a censorship-resistant stablecoin. If Tether chooses not to comply with US government regulations under the future Trump administration, it may become a dark stablecoin in the increasingly censored Internet economy.

In the dynamic world of corporate Bitcoin adoption, companies are constantly evaluated on their strategy and performance. A recent analysis by Blockstream CEO Adam Back has shone a spotlight on two prominent players: Japan’s Metaplanet and the U.S.-based Strategy (formerly MicroStrategy). Back introduced a fascinating metric, “months to mNAV cover,” to compare how quickly these companies’ Bitcoin earnings can effectively cover their modified net asset value (mNAV). This comparison offers a compelling perspective on the efficiency of their respective Bitcoin strategies. Adam Back’s “months to mNAV cover” metric provides a novel way to look at the performance of companies holding significant Bitcoin reserves. But what exactly does it mean? Essentially, it’s a measure of how quickly the growth of their primary treasury asset (Bitcoin) can theoretically offset or cover their total value, highlighting the velocity of value accumulation driven by BTC price appreciation. According to Adam Back’s analysis, Metaplanet is demonstrating significantly faster progress on this metric. He stated that Metaplanet takes just five months to reach mNAV cover, starkly contrasting with Strategy’s 19 months. This makes Metaplanet approximately 3.8 times faster. Several factors could contribute to Metaplanet’s accelerated pace: This speed isn’t just a number; it reflects how effectively Metaplanet’s capital allocation towards Bitcoin is translating into value growth relative to its size. MicroStrategy, under the leadership of Michael Saylor, pioneered the corporate treasury Bitcoin strategy. They were the first major publicly traded company to adopt Bitcoin as their primary reserve asset, beginning in 2020. Their approach has involved significant debt financing and equity offerings to acquire large quantities of BTC, accumulating a massive stack that currently exceeds 200,000 BTC. While Back’s metric shows MicroStrategy taking longer to cover its mNAV with Bitcoin earnings, this doesn’t necessarily diminish their overall success or the impact of their strategy. MicroStrategy operates a substantial software business alongside its Bitcoin holdings, contributing to its overall mNAV. The scale of their Bitcoin acquisitions is also vastly larger in absolute terms. The 19 months figure, while longer than Metaplanet’s, still indicates that even for a larger, more diversified company, Bitcoin earnings are a significant factor in their value trajectory. The comparison highlights that different companies, with varying structures and scales, will exhibit different speeds on this specific metric, even if both have successful Bitcoin strategies. Adam Back’s analysis extended beyond just the speed metric, touching upon the potential implications for Metaplanet’s share price. Based on the rapid mNAV cover speed, he suggested that Metaplanet’s share value could potentially rise significantly, citing a target of 1,340 yen from its then-current price of 533 yen. This represents a potential upside of over 150%. This projection is likely based on the idea that the market will increasingly value Metaplanet not just on its existing business, but on the rapid, Bitcoin-driven growth of its underlying value. As the company’s mNAV is covered faster by BTC appreciation, its shares might be re-rated to reflect this accelerated value accrual. However, it’s crucial to remember that stock prices are influenced by many factors beyond just Bitcoin holdings, including overall market sentiment, company-specific news, and the performance of their core business (though Metaplanet is increasingly focused on Bitcoin). Price targets are also subject to market volatility and the unpredictable nature of cryptocurrency prices. In related news that underscores Metaplanet’s commitment to its Bitcoin strategy, the company recently announced a resolution to issue 21.25 million USD (or 3.4 billion JPY) in bonds. The stated purpose of this bond issuance is specifically to fund additional purchases of Bitcoin. This move mirrors strategies previously employed by MicroStrategy and signals Metaplanet’s intent to leverage financial instruments to accelerate its Bitcoin accumulation. By issuing debt, the company can acquire Bitcoin without diluting existing equity (at the time of issuance) or relying solely on retained earnings. This aggressive approach, if successful in acquiring BTC at favorable prices and if Bitcoin’s value continues to appreciate, could further enhance the speed at which Metaplanet covers its mNAV through Bitcoin earnings. It also demonstrates confidence from investors willing to purchase these bonds, indicating a level of market belief in Metaplanet’s Bitcoin-centric direction and the potential for future BTC appreciation. The comparison between Metaplanet and MicroStrategy, facilitated by Adam Back’s metric, highlights a growing trend: corporations adding Bitcoin to their balance sheets. What started largely with MicroStrategy has now spread globally, with companies like Metaplanet in Japan, and others across various sectors, recognizing Bitcoin as a potential store of value, inflation hedge, and growth asset. This trend is significant because it brings institutional capital into the Bitcoin market, potentially increasing stability and driving further adoption. It also provides investors with publicly traded avenues to gain exposure to Bitcoin without directly holding the cryptocurrency themselves. Companies are adopting diverse strategies for acquiring Bitcoin, including using cash reserves, issuing debt (like Metaplanet’s recent bond issuance), and even integrating Bitcoin into their business operations or services. The success and varying speeds of companies like Metaplanet and MicroStrategy offer valuable case studies for other corporations considering a similar move. What can investors take away from this comparison and the developing corporate Bitcoin landscape? Investing in companies with significant Bitcoin exposure is an indirect way to participate in the Bitcoin market, but it comes with company-specific risks and opportunities that differ from holding BTC directly. Adam Back’s insightful comparison between Metaplanet and Strategy (MicroStrategy) using the “months to mNAV cover” metric introduces a fascinating perspective on the speed of value accrual driven by Bitcoin. Metaplanet’s reported 3.8x faster speed highlights its aggressive, focused approach and relative scale advantage in leveraging BTC appreciation to cover its asset value quickly. This rapid velocity, coupled with strategic moves like the recent bond issuance to acquire more Bitcoin, positions Metaplanet as a compelling, albeit different, case study alongside the pioneering efforts of MicroStrategy. While MicroStrategy continues to lead in absolute Bitcoin holdings, Metaplanet’s performance on Back’s speed metric suggests a potentially explosive growth trajectory relative to its size. This comparison is more than just a rivalry; it’s an illustration of the diverse ways companies are integrating Bitcoin into their financial strategies and the novel metrics analysts are developing to evaluate their success in this new frontier of corporate finance. The race to accumulate and leverage Bitcoin for corporate value is far from over, and companies like Metaplanet and MicroStrategy are setting key precedents for the future of corporate treasuries in the digital age. To learn more about the latest Bitcoin investment trends, explore our article on key developments shaping Corporate Bitcoin adoption. Disclaimer: The information provided is not trading advice, Bitcoinworld.co.in holds no liability for any investments made based on the information provided on this page. We strongly recommend independent research and/or consultation with a qualified professional before making any investment decisions.

The billionaires who used to run the show are now struggling to keep up. Elon Musk, Tim Cook, and Mark Zuckerberg are each trying to figure out how to survive a world where AI might tear down the exact systems they built. The same men who once crushed competition with new tech are now watching it come for them. They’re fighting to protect their empires from something they can’t fully control. According to The Wall Street Journal, this panic is already playing out in real time. This past Wednesday, Alphabet shares tanked more than 7% after a senior Apple executive admitted something unthinkable—Google search traffic through Safari just dropped for the first time in twenty years. Though Google later claimed search use is still growing on Apple devices, the market reaction was brutal. Tim Cook, CEO of Apple, is now trying to buy time. On the company’s recent earnings call, Tim didn’t launch any flashy features or major AI updates. Instead, he told investors to wait. “We just need more time to complete the work so they meet our high-quality bar,” he said. But while he’s asking for patience, Apple’s AI response is mostly silence and vague hype. Mark Zuckerberg, who built Facebook into an advertising machine, is now trying to keep it alive by turning it into an emotional chatbot factory. His new vision is to position AI as a friend for lonely people. It’s less about connection and more about keeping users locked in. Elon, who recently came back from messing around with DOGE and running X, is back at Tesla trying to convince investors the company still has juice. After Tesla stock slid, Elon jumped back into the spotlight to dangle promises of driverless cars again. “We’re not on edge of death—not even close,” he told analysts. The way he said it made people think of that old Monty Python line—“I’m not dead! … I feel happy!”—while everyone else is dragging your body to the dump. None of these tech giants are technically collapsing. Together, they’re worth around $7 trillion. But the fear underneath is obvious. They’re all staring down what could be a massive, slow collapse unless they adapt… fast. They’re now textbook cases of what Clayton Christensen called the Innovator’s Dilemma. In his book, he showed how companies doing everything right still fail when smaller players create something new. These new tools build markets in ways that the old companies never saw coming. Just like Netflix ended Blockbuster, and just like Apple’s iPhone blew past the phones of the 2000s, the next big shift might come from a startup nobody’s even watching. Big tech has seen this kind of threat before. During the dot-com boom, Pets.com looked like the next big winner, and failed fast. Even Christensen, who studied innovation for years, didn’t predict the iPhone. When it launched in 2007, he didn’t think it would shake up the phone industry. But it didn’t just kill old phones, it created mobile computing and the App Economy. Now, that app world may get flipped again. If AI agents become the new way people interact with services, Apple’s App Store model could start to vanish. People could just talk to bots instead of downloading anything. That might explain why Apple’s so quiet right now. Meanwhile, Google has at least put something on the table: Gemini, their AI assistant. But it’s not going smoothly. Gemini’s rollout was a mess. Users complained about biased answers, and Sundar Pichai, Google’s CEO, called the early responses “unacceptable.” He wrote, “No AI is perfect, especially at this emerging stage of the industry’s development, but we know the bar is high for us and we will keep at it for however long it takes.” The problem is that most of Google’s business still comes from ads. People clicking on links make the money roll in. But if people stop asking Google and start asking bots, the clicks dry up. That’s why everyone’s nervous. The startups don’t have that problem. They’re hungry. Right now, nobody’s dead. But it’s looking like someone might be soon. Your crypto news deserves attention - KEY Difference Wire puts you on 250+ top sites