Two OpenSea users who accused the non-fungible token (NFT) marketplace of selling unregistered securities dropped their proposed class-action lawsuit after a judge allowed the firm to demand arbitration.

On Nov. 7, Anthony Shnayderman and Itai Bronshtein filed a voluntary dismissal of their securities suit against Ozone Networks, which does business as OpenSea, in a Florida federal court after Judge Cecilia Altonaga allowed OpenSea to file a motion to compel the pair into arbitration.

OpenSea held firm that it would compel the two users into arbitration, claiming in an October filing that they had agreed to its terms of use that say all claims would be resolved by an arbitrator — including if the claims should be arbitrated in the first place.

In the October filing, the NFT marketplace added that it “intends to promptly move to compel Plaintiffs to arbitrate their claims in the agreed-upon forum,” and it would appeal any denial by a court, putting the case on pause.

OpenSea users drop securities suit after marketplace demands arbitration image 0

An excerpt from OpenSea’s October argument claims users agree to resolve issues through alternative dispute resolution services provider JAMS. Source: CourtListener

Shnayderman and Bronshtein’s lawyer, Adam Moskowitz from The Moskowitz Law Firm, told Cointelegraph they “had no choice but to dismiss the pending case.”

He added their “main goal” for the case was to “create a framework, whereby our experts, and their experts, could accomplish what others have not been able to do, namely, try to create a workable global marketplace for NFTs [...] in light of the upcoming changing political and legislative changes.”

“We still think OpenSea could help, especially in supervising and monitoring NFTs traded on their own exchange, for which they directly profit,” Moskowitz said. “We will certainly continue to investigate how we can best help those victims of failed NFTs and other crypto products.”

An OpenSea spokesperson told Cointelegraph it was “pleased the plaintiffs have chosen to dismiss their lawsuit, which was without merit.”

“We’re confident that OpenSea operates legally and that our users aren’t trading securities when they buy or sell NFTs using our platform,” the spokesperson said.

Shnayderman and Bronshtein launched the proposed suit in September, claiming the NFTs they bought on OpenSea were unregistered securities contracts in the United States and were worthless “due to their illegal nature.”

They argued OpenSea’s August disclosure of a Securities and Exchange Commission Wells notice — a warning the agency could bring an enforcement action —  “suggests that OpenSea is in the hot seat and may be found liable for facilitating the exchange of unregistered securities.”

Related: OpenSea promises comeback with new, improved platform

The suit also pointed to the SEC’s successful action against NFT projects Stoner Cats 2 and Impact Theory, where it said the NFTs were unregistered securities .

At the time, an OpenSea spokesperson refuted the allegations, called the suit “baseless,”  and told Cointelegraph, “Conjuring from thin air a purported class-action lawsuit based on our disclosure of an SEC Wells notice won’t make the allegations in the complaint true.”

Magazine: NFT Creator — ‘No matter how bad it gets, there’s a lot going on with NFTs’: 24 Hours of Art

Update (Nov. 12, 12:00 am UTC): This article has been updated to add a response from OpenSea.