Pencils Protocolの‌価格DAPP

𝐖𝐡𝐞𝐧 𝐓𝐨𝐤𝐞𝐧 𝐃𝐢𝐬𝐭𝐫𝐢𝐛𝐮𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐈𝐬 𝐉𝐮𝐬𝐭 𝐚 𝐇𝐞𝐢𝐬𝐭... 𝐕𝐚𝐦𝐩𝐢𝐫𝐞 𝐈𝐧𝐜𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐢𝐯𝐞 A Weekend Dose: "If you’re calling it a distribution and not a diversion, you’re lying to yourself." Token distribution has lost its soul. What once was a tool for empowering ecosystems is now a blade for bleeding them dry. Most new projects offer bait. This is a liquidity ambush. And with several TGEs around the corner, I don't know how to feel. --- 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐑𝐞𝐚𝐥 𝐍𝐚𝐭𝐮𝐫𝐞 You’ve seen the pitch: “Stake here, earn more, unlock potential.” Under that surface, the strategy is cold-blooded. Token distribution designed around short-term yield is a silent war strategy. They are not mechanisms to build user love or product feedback loops. They’re engineered drains, parasitic models that extract value from other ecosystems, then collapse inward when the reward fumes vanish. What’s worse? Many teams have no intention of holding attention once the TVL arrives. --- 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐅𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐡 𝐊𝐢𝐥𝐥 𝐋𝐢𝐬𝐭 (𝟐𝟎𝟐𝟑–𝟐𝟎𝟐𝟒) a. Blast (2023) → Mechanism: Users locked ETH for weeks with no L2 product, just points. → Vampire Move: A vault with no key. Yield came from outsourced DeFi protocols such as Lido and Maker, not Blast itself. It was spun as “future upside.” → Heist Factor: $500M+ locked without utility. → Fallout: No protocol loyalty. Capital was mercenary. Most yield farmers pulled out post-airdrop. Alive or Dead? Alive, but limping. b. Starknet (2024)- Loyalty Doesn’t Pay → Mechanism: Starknet launched a massive airdrop but ended up ignoring core dApp users. → Vampire Move: The airdrop was a marketing blast, hoping for narrative buy-in. → Heist Factor: STRK became a liquidity event. → Fallout: Token dumped hard. dApp developers distanced themselves from the L2. Alive or Dead? Alive. Tech is solid, but the distribution strategy affected their legitimacy. If composability doesn't match community repair, expect fragmentation. --- 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐏𝐬𝐲𝐜𝐡𝐨𝐥𝐨𝐠𝐲 𝐨𝐟 𝐁𝐥𝐨𝐨𝐝𝐬𝐮𝐜𝐤𝐢𝐧𝐠 Vampire incentives thrive on urgency and illusion. ‣‣ Hype emissions like they’re rare, ‣‣ Promise future access while delivering nothing today, ‣‣ Target rival TVL, not rival innovation... These designs never account for Retention, Conversion, and Affection. --- 𝐖𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐓𝐡𝐞𝐲 𝐒𝐡𝐨𝐮𝐥𝐝’𝐯𝐞 𝐄𝐧𝐠𝐢𝐧𝐞𝐞𝐫𝐞𝐝 𝐈𝐧𝐬𝐭𝐞𝐚𝐝 Here are suggestions that might fix the playbook: → Progressive Commitment: Reward long-term behavior. Deposit amounts matter, but time-in-market and governance. → Negative Flow Filtering: Penalize short-term mercenaries. Retroactive slashing of rewards for wallets that exit within 7 days might work. → Recursive Loyalty: Create multipliers for users who return and continue to contribute. The goal is to enable social alignment. The best incentive is a product that users want to stay for. --- Liquidity that runs at the sight of blood was never yours to begin with. If the tokenomics is not building loyalty loops, it is not a growing protocol. But how would you know?

$DATA (Mid/Longterm) This is one of the most underrated plays in the analytics space right now. Track early projects, follow KOLs, and catch alpha before the rest of CT even blinks, all through a slick, easy-to-use dApp. Holding $DATA unlocks unlimited access to their

Charts we enjoy in last few Days & keep sending all into Top gainers 🚀 $CROS 80% $CIRUS 80% $TRISIG 75% $DAPP 70% $HIP 57% $DAPP 31% $STAGE    75%            $PIX 35% $SOCIAL 4X $PIX

Web3 protocols today face a systemic dilemma: High intent, low conversion. This is a product of the rollup-centric, multi-VM landscape. Onboarding friction across wallets, chains & complex cross-chain workflows turns many promising users away before they even start. This is where UX-centric, chain-abstracted services become a GTM unlock. @ParticleNtwrk’s Universal Accounts hits right on the spot: 🔸A single user account that abstracts all the friction. 🔸Deposit on one chain → swap on another → farm on a third 🔸 Unified wallet, identity & dapp experience. This isn’t just ‘UX enhancement’ imo, its protocol-level infra reshaping how products acquire users, retain liquidity & scale across ecosystems. ------ From Siloed Apps to Networked Protocols: Chain abstraction enables a paradigm shift: Isolated ecosystem-bound apps → interoperable, network-native protocols. What was once a thesis is now being proven now. @ParticleNtwrk’s latest wave of @UseUniversalX integrations signals the first tangible phase of adoption: 🔹@honeypotfinance: Evolved from a @berachain launchpad into a chain-agnostic token launch venue with native reach across chains. 🔹 @zkhelixlabs: Single-chain staking model → omnichain liquidity protocol 🔹 @Overtime_io: Chain-agonistic UX to prediction markets 🔹 @MYX_Finance: Abstracted UX to on-chain perps 🔹 @ClutchMarkets: Borderless experience to prediction markets 🔹 Mantis Network: Simplify cross-chain UX & features 🔹@ChimpxAI : Cross-chain AI intent engine, routing swaps & liquidity in a way that's invisible to the user. These integrations reflect a growing reality: Products are beginning to shift their design philosophy & no longer building for individual ecosystems, but for interoperable presence across the broader Web3 landscape. ------ On Network Effects: As more projects integrate UAs on Particle Network, they tap into a shared distribution layer: 1. Utility scales horizontally as UA users seamlessly interact across protocols. 2. Network effects compound, driving higher retention, composability & shared liquidity. 3. Every integration strengthens the ecosystem for all participants. The growth effect compounds here much like a ‘super-app’ model in web2 where multi-features are unified mirroring the unification of UA web3 UX. ----- On Value-Accrual: Every chain-abstracted action on @ParticleNtwrk is powered by $PARTI, the native asset of its underlying settlement layer (Parti Chain). More dApp and ecosystem integrations → More user activity → Higher $PARTI demand This results in direct value accrual tied to network-level growth, positioning $PARTI as the economic fuel powering the abstracted user layer of Web3. ------ TLDR: Chain abstraction isn’t the future. It’s already the new standard.

Big news from the Sei ecosystem! Sei Labs has recently put forth a significant governance proposal that could reshape the future of the network. If approved, the proposal would transition the Sei blockchain to an architecture focused exclusively on the Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM). According to reports from The Block, this isn’t just a minor tweak. The proposal specifically calls for the deprecation of CosmWasm, which is Cosmos’s native smart contract platform, and would also end support for native Cosmos accounts on Sei. You might be wondering why Sei Labs wants to make such a fundamental change. The core motivation behind this proposed shift is to significantly streamline Sei’s infrastructure. The goal? To boost both usability and performance across the network. Currently, the Sei network supports a dual architecture, catering to both EVM-compatible accounts and native Cosmos accounts. While this might seem flexible on the surface, Sei Labs has noted that this setup introduces considerable complexity. This complexity isn’t just a theoretical issue; it creates friction for developers building on the platform and can make the user experience less intuitive than it could be. By simplifying the architecture and focusing solely on the EVM, Sei Labs believes they can unlock new levels of efficiency and performance. A key technical benefit they highlight is leveraging EVM parallelization. What does this mean for you as a user or developer? This move aligns Sei more closely with the dominant smart contract standard in the industry, potentially attracting a larger pool of developers and users already familiar with EVM. One of the most notable aspects of the proposal is the call for CosmWasm deprecation. CosmWasm has been a part of the Sei architecture, allowing developers to build smart contracts using Rust within the Cosmos ecosystem. Ending support for CosmWasm and native Cosmos accounts represents a clear pivot away from its multi-chain, Cosmos-native roots towards a more singular, EVM-centric future. This part of the proposal will be particularly impactful for developers who have been building using CosmWasm on Sei. It signals a need for potential migration strategies if the proposal passes. Sei’s proposed shift isn’t just a technical tweak; it’s a strategic decision about its positioning within the competitive blockchain landscape. By choosing an EVM-only architecture, Sei is betting that specializing in a highly optimized EVM environment will be its key differentiator. This strategy aims to combine the familiarity and extensive tooling of the EVM ecosystem with Sei’s core strengths, such as its parallel processing capabilities designed for trading and exchange applications. It’s a move to potentially capture a larger share of the dApp market by offering a high-performance, EVM-compatible alternative. The proposal is now subject to community governance. This means Sei token holders will have the opportunity to review and vote on whether to adopt this significant architectural change. The outcome of this vote will determine the future technical direction of the Sei blockchain. This is a critical moment for the Sei community, as the decision will have long-term implications for developers, users, and the network’s overall strategy. Sei Labs has put forward a bold proposal to transition the Sei network to an EVM-only architecture, which includes the CosmWasm deprecation and ending support for native Cosmos accounts. The primary drivers are improving performance through EVM parallelization and enhancing usability and developer experience by streamlining the blockchain architecture. This strategic move aims to position Sei EVM as a leading high-performance platform within the dominant EVM ecosystem. The final decision rests with the community through the governance process. To learn more about the latest blockchain architecture trends and proposals like the Sei EVM shift, explore our articles on key developments shaping the future of decentralized networks. Disclaimer: The information provided is not trading advice, Bitcoinworld.co.in holds no liability for any investments made based on the information provided on this page. We strongly recommend independent research and/or consultation with a qualified professional before making any investment decisions.