Mint Club V1の‌価格MINT

$RDAC is starting to gain traction in the world of decentralized content creation and distribution. With the growing demand for creators to maintain ownership and control over their work, $RDAC could become a key asset in platforms that allow creators to monetize their content without relying on centralized intermediaries. By integrating $RDAC into digital platforms, creators could receive direct payments for their content, whether it’s videos, music, or artwork. Smart contracts would ensure creators are paid instantly and transparently, while offering users the ability to support their favorite creators through microtransactions or subscriptions using $RDAC. Additionally, $RDAC could play a role in the NFT market, enabling artists to mint unique digital assets that represent ownership of their work. With the rise of Web3, where users demand more control over their digital identities and content, $RDAC could provide the financial infrastructure to power these decentralized platforms. Through partnerships with decentralized media platforms or content-sharing services, $RDAC could enhance the user experience by making transactions seamless and affordable. As creators seek more control over their work, $RDAC may find itself at the center of a broader shift in how digital content is produced and consumed.

Now tracking @rootsfi on @berachain Allows users to collateralize Berachain LP tokens, Mint MEAD stablecoin and retain their BGT faming upside

$SHM #Do you trade or hold SHM?Bullish or bearish? Scaled predefined issuance schedules reduce reward percentage through disinflation at different points, whether approximately every 4 years (210,000 blocks) as in the case of Bitcoin or every year with a 1.5% disinflation rate as in the case of Solana. Linear issuance schedules mint a set amount of the network's native asset over a specified duration and this is the issuance schedule of projects like Algorand. These issuance schedules did not apply to Shardeum; they caused an inefficient and unpredictable network, a lack of profitability, or too high an APY for long-term sustainability. Secondly, we ran simulations on the network to see how some of these pre-existing tokenomics models applied to SHM, confirming they were not applicable due to the aforementioned reasons and that the optimal SHM model would always be flexible enough to reach supply equilibrium. Thirdly, the unique scalability properties of Shardeum, necessitate a unique tokenomics model and policy. Shardeum can automatically assemble and disassemble shards to expand and contract the network to increase throughput or storage capacity, as Shardeum uses dynamic state sharding, autoscaling and linear scaling to solve the blockchain trilemma. These unique scalability properties necessitated the creation of standby nodes and active nodes. The ratio between these nodes is called the S:A ratio and is critical to the efficient and secure operation of the network. The S:A ratio is the number of standby nodes to the number of active nodes. Standby nodes are randomly selected each cycle and rotated into the active set to start consensus; simultaneously, active nodes participating in the active set for the longest time are removed and rotated back into the standby set, becoming standby nodes again. This kind of rotation increases node and network decentralization. A higher S:A ratio ensures the network can scale more effectively, enhances decentralization and mitigates the risk of a majority takeover or a Sybil attack. If the S:A ratio gets too high, negligible benefit to the network occurs and can lead to the network becoming inefficient. Conversely, the network is more efficient if the S:A ratio is lower, but if the ratio falls too low, it poses the most significant risk because the network would lose its ability to scale. The graphs below demonstrate how following a predefined issuance schedule with a horizontally scaling architecture results in massive fluctuations in APY%. In the bull case (Ethereum), the native asset increases in value rapidly, causing the network to become wildly profitable for node operators and resulting in the network becoming inefficient (delivering a higher APY% than needed). In the bear case (Algorand), the price of the native asset decreases, which results in the network becoming unprofitable for node providers (delivering negative APY% returns when hardware expenses are considered). The likely outcome would be a massive reduction in node operators; this causes significant problems for horizontally scaling networks, which could mean the network loses its ability to scale (increase TPS).

1. Overview of Shimmer ($SHM) Shimmer is a staging network for the IOTA ecosystem, designed to test and validate new features before they are deployed on the IOTA mainnet. The $SHM token serves as the native cryptocurrency of the Shimmer network, facilitating transactions, smart contracts, and decentralized applications (dApps). 2. Token Standards on Shimmer Shimmer supports multiple token standards, primarily: - Native Tokens (IOTA Standard Tokenization)– Similar to IOTA’s tokenization framework, allowing users to mint and manage custom tokens. - EVM-Compatible Tokens (ERC-20, ERC-721, etc.) – Since Shimmer supports an EVM-compatible smart contract chain, it can host Ethereum-style tokens. 3. Key Features of $SHM Token Standard - Feeless Transactions (L1) – Like IOTA, Shimmer’s base layer (L1) allows feeless transfers of $SHM and native tokens. - Smart Contract Support (L2) – ShimmerEVM enables ERC-20, ERC-721, and other Ethereum-compatible tokens. - Scalability & Interoperability – Designed for cross-chain compatibility with IOTA and other networks. #### **4. Comparison with Other Token Standards** | Feature | $SHM (Shimmer Native) | ERC-20 (ShimmerEVM) | IOTA Native Tokens | |------------------|----------------------|---------------------|-------------------| | Transaction Fee | Feeless (L1) | Gas fees (EVM) | Feeless | | Smart Contracts | No (L1 only) | Yes (EVM) | No | | Interoperability | IOTA & Shimmer | Cross-chain (EVM) | IOTA Ecosystem | | Use Cases | Payments, Staking | DeFi, NFTs | Asset Tokenization | 5. Use Cases for $SHM - Governance: Used for voting on Shimmer network upgrades. - Staking & Rewards: Securing the network and earning incentives. -Gas for ShimmerEVM Paying transaction fees in DeFi and dApps. - Bridging Assets: Moving tokens between IOTA, Shimmer, and EVM chains. 6. Potential Risks & Challenges - Adoption Dependency: Success relies on IOTA/Shimmer ecosystem growth. - Regulatory Uncertainty: Like all crypto assets, regulatory scrutiny may impact usage. - Smart Contract Risks: If deployed on ShimmerEVM, vulnerabilities (e.g., hacks, bugs) could arise. 7. Future Developments - More dApps & DeFi integrations on ShimmerEVM. - Cross-chain bridges with Ethereum, IOTA, and other networks. - Enhanced token standards (e.g., SMR-20, a Shimmer-native token standard).

$OBOL’s recent push into the NFT space has raised concerns among traders and collectors. While NFTs continue to attract attention in the digital art world, $OBOL’s decision to enter the market has been met with skepticism due to the unpredictable nature of NFT prices and growing criticism of the environmental impact associated with minting and trading NFTs. The platform’s entry into the NFT space is aimed at diversifying its offering, but there are worries that the oversaturation of the market could lead to a bubble. Many NFTs are being released with little intrinsic value beyond speculative investment, leading to concerns that a crash could be imminent, especially as the broader market faces macroeconomic pressures. Furthermore, the environmental concerns surrounding blockchain technology have been increasingly scrutinized. The energy consumption required to mint and trade NFTs has drawn criticism from sustainability advocates, and with $OBOL leveraging a blockchain that may not be as energy-efficient as others, the platform could face public backlash, potentially affecting its reputation. Investors and traders in $OBOL’s ecosystem may want to reconsider their positions in light of these emerging risks. With the NFT market showing signs of volatility and environmental criticisms mounting, cautious engagement with $OBOL’s new NFT offerings may be prudent.