GameGPTの‌価格DUEL

Does history repeat itself? In 2025, capital movements on Bitcoin platforms strangely resemble the tremors of 2023. The numbers speak for themselves: net outflows reach levels unseen for two years, while exchange reserves plunge to historic depths. But behind these statistics lies an invisible duel: whales accumulate, small holders capitulate. A scenario reminiscent of the beginnings of a bull cycle, where strategy and psychology clash. Bitcoin exchanges are experiencing a silent hemorrhage. According to CryptoQuant, the net flows over 100 days show their lowest level since 2023. Translation: BTC outflows massively exceed inflows. A paradoxical signal. While prices remain high, investors withdraw their assets as if anticipating a storm… or a lull. Exchange reserves themselves are nearing historic lows. In April 2025, they drop to 2.535 million bitcoins, down 7% since January. This is a continuous erosion reminiscent of 2022, when liquidity drought preceded a rebound. For CryptoOnChain , this dynamic suggests a massive “reaccumulation.” Bitcoins leave digital vaults for private wallets, out of reach of impulsive sales. Yet, no panic wind is blowing across the markets. Selling volumes remain stable, unlike past crashes. As if actors, seasoned by previous cycles, were now playing a more calculated tune. Exchanges are no longer arenas of frenzied speculation but transition hubs toward long-term strategies. While small holders sell, whales cast their nets. Data from Santiment reveals a striking fact: wallets holding between 10 and 10,000 BTC now control 67.77% of the supply. In April, they swallowed an additional 53,600 bitcoins despite the turbulence. A voracious appetite contrasting with the retail investors’ sell-off. Miles Deutscher sums up the situation with a biting formula: “When the price falls, whales buy, retail panics.” CryptoQuant charts confirm this: large transactions (>1,000 BTC) jump at every correction, like a metronome reversing market reflexes. Individuals, on the other hand, succumb to old demons: fear of missing the peak, obsession with perfect timing. This strategic divide is no coincidence. It reflects a maturing market. Whales, often funds or institutions, maneuver with the composure of chess players. Retail reacts to media noise, sudden hikes, or regulatory rumors. The result: Bitcoin becomes a two-speed asset, where information asymmetry widens the gap between insiders targeting the million and newcomers.

In the face of the stalemate of the conflict in Ukraine, Donald Trump is changing his tone and threatening Moscow with a heavy economic blow. The American president, until now measured towards the Kremlin, is now wielding the card of tariff sanctions on Russian oil. Indeed, the stated goal is to compel Vladimir Putin to move towards a ceasefire. A shocking statement that fractures diplomatic balances and elicits reactions even in European capitals, at a time when the slightest tension can redefine the global geopolitical chessboard. In a televised statement broadcast by NBC News, Donald Trump announced that he was considering imposing new taxes on Russia in the event of failed negotiations for a ceasefire in Ukraine. The American president, often perceived as conciliatory towards Vladimir Putin, has raised his voice this time: If Russia and I cannot reach an agreement to stop the bloodshed in Ukraine, and if I believe that it is Russia’s fault, I will impose secondary tariffs on oil. He specified that these taxes could rise to “25% to 50%”, depending on the extent of the blockages in discussions. Here are the key points of this announcement: This media appearance marks a turning point in Trump’s communication regarding the Ukrainian issue. It fits into a logic of maximum pressure, mobilizing American economic tools to influence the outcome of a conflict with major geostrategic implications. More than just a warning, Donald Trump’s comments were triggered by a controversial Russian proposal: to create a transitional government in Kiev. An idea described as “not the right direction” by the American president, who sees in this initiative an unacceptable attempt at political manipulation. This rejection marks a new red line in relations between the two powers and reflects a hardening of exchanges. The tone is rising between the two leaders whose relations had until now been marked by a certain tactical cordiality. This American stance has provoked mixed international reactions. On the European side, several officials fear that a hasty ceasefire could favor a reconstitution of Russian forces and rekindle threats against NATO countries. Far from being a diplomatic advance, this rhetorical escalation could conversely complicate mediation efforts. If Russia decides to respond to these threats by adapting its exports to other areas, or by tightening its energy alliances with China or India, it is the global balance of the oil market that could waver. The follow-up to this diplomatic confrontation remains uncertain, but the intentions are clear: Trump wants to influence the resolution of the Ukrainian conflict by wielding the economic threat. It remains to be seen whether this tariff pressure strategy will convince Moscow to yield ground or whether it will only further radicalize positions. For markets as well as for governments, the time is now for caution and observation of the upcoming developments of this high-intensity energy duel, in a context where Trump confirms his protectionist policy .

Last year, some dreamed of perverting Bitcoin with flashy NFTs, magical layers 2, and convoluted re-staking. Purists were outraged, arguing that BTC should be left alone. Should we have waited? Clearly yes: today, these crypto whims are almost extinguished. While the fires of innovation crackled, the hype has subsided. But what remains of these promises now vanished? In the crypto universe, certain concepts have a habit of dancing and then taking their bow. Such is the case of Ordinals, these Bitcoin NFTs that made wallets vibrate. In 2024, their volume reached 1.4 billion dollars. In 2025? Barely 280 million. A free fall of 80%. The same fate for Bitcoin’s layers 2: at the beginning of 2024, more than 80 projects tried to charm investors and the media. Six months later, the soufflé has collapsed. “It was overestimated from the start,” confides Charlie Hu, co-founder of Bitlayer. Also lagging behind: re-staking, this clumsy innovation now reduced to two or three survivors. Muneeb Ali, founder of Stacks, drives the nail home : “the honeymoon is over.” Crypto entrepreneurs are starting to speak the truth. Too late? Has the crypto market become allergic to its own excesses? However, amidst the debris of hype, one idea seems to hold its ground: Bitcoin DeFi. Some envision it as a more solid alternative, less flashy. Dominik Harz (Build on Bitcoin) states it bluntly : The Bitcoin DeFi has not yet taken off. To date, 0.3% of Bitcoin’s market cap fuels DeFi uses, compared to 30% for Ethereum. A chasm of x100. But the foundations are there. Thanks to technologies like zkBTC, transactions are becoming ultra-fast, low-cost, and programmable. The future? Perhaps in the fusion between the Bitcoin blockchain and the agility of DeFi. Some, like @SamaAlbert90, already speak of a “new financial era“. The prediction of the BitcoinOS CEO? A DeFi ecosystem on Bitcoin valued at $10 billion if Ethereum stumbles. And why not? If layers 2 become performance-serving architectural tools, investments could follow. Is the flagship crypto ready to become a base for sustainable financial innovations? The cold war continues between Bitcoin and Ethereum, each camp holding onto its ambitions. Ethereum is preparing its “Hoodi” update , crucial for its scalability. If it fails, Bitcoin could scoop the pot. It would be a turning point. With its new technical layers (zkRollups, EVM compatible), Bitcoin offers attractive solutions. Maxwell Sanchez (Hemi Labs) reminds us that copying and pasting Ethereum’s tech is not enough: “It must adapt to the very core of Bitcoin.” Translation: there’s no need to force a square into a round hole. The Bitcoin network must grow in its own way. On Ethereum’s side, the pressure is high. Every major update is a risky promise. The complexity of “Hoodi” could create more problems than solutions. Meanwhile, Bitcoin is refining its vision, developing its layer 2 protocols, and waiting for its rival’s misstep. Who will win the duel of the titans in the crypto market? The one who convinces developers, users, and investors over the long term. And you, who are you betting on? Despite their apparent discredit, Bitcoin’s layers 2 could very well explode . A recent report from the Spartan Group discusses their explosive potential in the medium term… to be continued.

In light of a recent periodic review, Bitget is delisting a total of 73 trading pairs on 18 March 2025, 10:00 (UTC). Details are as follows: PORTUMA/USDT, GODL/USDT, LAIKA/USDT, NOOB/USDT, LIFEFORM/USDT, AREA/USDT, RMV/USDT, OMAX/USDT, VEXT/USDT, GXE/USDT, CATA/USDT, UNIO/USDT, TSUGT/USDT, PIKA/USDT, ZKF/USDT, CATCH/USDT, PZP/USDT, SOCIAL/USDT, EMT/USDT, BLASTUP/USDT, CANTO/USDT, DFC/USDT, DAPP/USDT, SML/USDT, SXCH/USDT, KATA/USDT, UNICE/USDT, DUKO/USDT, JUNGLE/USDT, TRC/USDT, XCHNG/USDT, DCK/USDT BEER/USDT,AIX/USDT, RBTC/USDT, KAON/USDT, SIN/USDT, PMG/USDT, CAPS/USDT, UNFI/USDT, KEY/USDT, PGC/USDT, LIQUIDIUM/USDT, SYLO/USDT, XZK/USDT, SNIFT/USDT, BOND/USDT, MCHC/USDT, CAGA/USDT, 10SET/USDT, JOY/USDT, SALD/USDT, CBPAY/USDT, MSTR/USDT, FURY/USDT, GUI/USDT, COMAI/USDT, APRS/USDT, TUP/USDT, HIPP/USDT, GEMS/USDT, BLS/USDT, FORT/USDT, DUEL/USDT, PAW/USDT, XPLA/USDT, HELLO/USDT, SEAM/USDT, OMNIA/USDT, HAPPY/USDT, ELIZA/USDT, SHOGGOTH/USDT, SCIHUB/USDT

Bitget Help Center Delisting information Trading pair delisting Notice of Delisting 73 Spot Trading Pairs on 18 March 2025 Notice of Delisting 73 Spot Trading Pairs on 18 March 2025 2025-03-11 15:001311101 Each digital asset we list is regularly reviewed for quality assurance to ensure it adheres to our platform standards. In addition to the security and stability of the digital asset’s network, we consider numerous other factors in our evaluation process, including: Trading volume and liquidity Team involvement in the project Development of the project Network or smart contract stability Activeness of the community Responsiveness of the project Negligence or unethical conduct In light of a recent periodic review, Bitget is delisting a total of 73 trading pairs on 18 March 2025, 10:00 (UTC). Details are as follows: PORTUMA/USDT, GODL/USDT, LAIKA/USDT, NOOB/USDT, LIFEFORM/USDT, AREA/USDT, RMV/USDT, OMAX/USDT, VEXT/USDT, GXE/USDT, CATA/USDT, UNIO/USDT, TSUGT/USDT, PIKA/USDT, ZKF/USDT, CATCH/USDT, PZP/USDT, SOCIAL/USDT, EMT/USDT, BLASTUP/USDT, CANTO/USDT, DFC/USDT, DAPP/USDT, SML/USDT, SXCH/USDT, KATA/USDT, UNICE/USDT, DUKO/USDT, JUNGLE/USDT, TRC/USDT, XCHNG/USDT, DCK/USDT BEER/USDT,AIX/USDT, RBTC/USDT, KAON/USDT, SIN/USDT, PMG/USDT, CAPS/USDT, UNFI/USDT, KEY/USDT, PGC/USDT, LIQUIDIUM/USDT, SYLO/USDT, XZK/USDT, SNIFT/USDT, BOND/USDT, MCHC/USDT, CAGA/USDT, 10SET/USDT, JOY/USDT, SALD/USDT, CBPAY/USDT, MSTR/USDT, FURY/USDT, GUI/USDT, COMAI/USDT, APRS/USDT, TUP/USDT, HIPP/USDT, GEMS/USDT, BLS/USDT, FORT/USDT, DUEL/USDT, PAW/USDT, XPLA/USDT, HELLO/USDT, SEAM/USDT, OMNIA/USDT, HAPPY/USDT, ELIZA/USDT, SHOGGOTH/USDT, SCIHUB/USDT