Orderly Network Kurs ORDER

SUI Breakout Incoming? Bulls Eye Key Levels! Sui ($SUI) is currently trading at $2.4191, up +4.75%, showing renewed bullish momentum. The price recently tested $2.4505 but faced slight resistance. 📊 Key Levels to Watch: Resistance: $2.4505 – A break above this could trigger a move toward $2.50+ Support: $2.2600 – Holding above this level keeps bullish momentum intact 📈 Market Overview: 24h Volume: 8.22M SUI 7-day Performance: +5.90% 180-day Growth: +47.52% Potential Trade Setup: Bullish Breakout: Entry above $2.45, targeting $2.50 – $2.55 Bearish Scenario: Losing $2.26 could lead to a retest of $2.20 With ETF rumors circulating and increased buy-side pressure (73% buying in order book), SUI could be gearing up for another leg up. Keep an eye on volume confirmation!

The $PI /USDT pair is currently trading at $0.9376, reflecting a 0.11% decline in the last hour. Despite recent volatility, where PI saw a 24-hour high of $0.9992 and a low of $0.9088, the price remains in a consolidation phase. Market Overview & Trends 📉 Short-Term Weakness: PI has experienced a -0.50% drop today, extending its weekly decline to -17.99% and its monthly losses to -39.21%. 📊 Technical Indicators: Moving Averages: The 5-period MA ($0.9391) and 10-period MA ($0.9354) are trending below the 20-period MA ($0.9411), signaling near-term resistance. Order Book Sentiment: Buyers hold a 58% dominance, indicating potential support at this level. Key Levels to Watch Support: $0.9088 (24h low) Resistance: $0.9992 (24h high) With Pi Network’s Open Network transition still unfolding, traders should monitor price action for a potential breakout or further downside risks. A strong break above $1.00 could shift momentum bullish, while a loss of support at $0.90 might invite further selling pressure.

In a stunning revelation that adds political intrigue to an already high-profile legal battle, Reuters has uncovered that the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) interim chief, Mark Uyeda, cast the sole dissenting vote against suing Elon Musk earlier this year. The closed-door vote, held just days before Republicans took control of the agency in January, approved a lawsuit over Musk’s delayed disclosure of Twitter stock purchases. The 4-1 decision not only highlights deep internal divisions within the SEC but also raises serious questions about political pressure, regulatory integrity, and the future of enforcement under a Musk-friendly administration. In a quiet but consequential January vote, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) decided 4-1 to sue Elon Musk over his delayed disclosure of Twitter shares. The vote, revealed exclusively by Reuters , exposed a deep rift within the agency. The lone dissenter? Republican Commissioner Mark Uyeda, now the SEC’s interim chief. His "no" vote came just days before a political shift in Washington saw Republicans take control of the agency. The core issue stems from Musk’s 2022 acquisition of Twitter (now X), when he disclosed his stake 21 days late—far beyond the required 10-day window for holdings exceeding 5%. That delay, the SEC argues, allowed him to scoop up more shares at lower prices, saving him $150 million and triggering market movements. The agency sued Musk on January 14, just a week after the commissioners' internal vote. Uyeda, a Republican appointee and close observer of political implications, reportedly questioned the motives behind the lawsuit. Before the vote, he asked SEC enforcement staff to sign pledges that the case was free from political influence—an unusual move rejected by the staff. His opposition was not necessarily about Musk’s actions, but about the optics and timing of the enforcement, which came just before a change in administration. The timing has raised eyebrows. Musk is a known ally of President Donald Trump, and the vote occurred just before Republican leadership took over the SEC. Trump has since issued an executive order accusing the SEC of partisan targeting under Biden and demanded a review of politically driven investigations. Though the SEC declined to comment, the lawsuit’s proximity to the power shift casts doubt on the agency’s neutrality in the eyes of critics. The commission reportedly demanded Musk give up the $150 million in alleged gains and pay an additional penalty. While Uyeda voted no, fellow Republican Hester Peirce sided with the three Democratic commissioners, allowing the lawsuit to proceed. The decision shows an unusual split within Republican ranks and underscores the internal friction over how to deal with the billionaire entrepreneur. Intent was key. SEC investigators explored whether Musk knowingly delayed the filing—a charge that could carry more severe consequences. Musk, however, claimed he misunderstood the rule and eventually complied. The SEC dropped the intent angle but still pursued civil penalties. Musk had agreed to be deposed twice but resisted further interviews, delaying the case until after the 2024 election. Legal experts question the SEC’s sluggish pace. A late filing case is typically straightforward. "Bringing it at the last minute—it loses credibility," said Howard Fischer, a former SEC lawyer. Others argue that not filing at all would have looked like selective enforcement, undermining the agency’s role in upholding fair markets. Musk has until April 4 to respond to the court summons. With Uyeda now leading the SEC and Trump ordering a review of the agency’s actions, the Musk case could become a lightning rod in the wider war over regulatory power and political influence. Musk’s long-standing feud with the SEC—dating back to his 2018 Tesla tweet saga—adds more fuel to the fire. The internal divide within the SEC, revealed in this exclusive report, paints a picture of an agency caught between law and politics. Whether the case against Musk is about justice or timing remains an open question—one that could reshape the future of securities enforcement in a deeply divided America.

kese ke pass 4 usdt hai mujhe chaye hai kiu ke mere pas 6 hai withdrawal karna need hia 10 se kam nhi ho rha $U2U $WUF $INVITE $NEIROETH $ORDER $SUNDOG $BTC $ETH $DOGS $GEEK $BCH $WIF

Ripple Labs, the leading blockchain company has initiated a dialogue with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to introduce greater regulatory clarity for digital assets. The company’s suggestion comes to Hester Peirce, who’s leading the newly formed Crypto Task Force by the SEC, who demanded public input for clear crypto tax rules. Crypto Mom Hester Peirce is willing to end the regulatory blockade created by the previous SEC administration under the leadership of Gary Gensler. Responding to this, Ripple slammed the Gary Gensler administration stating that it crypto administration was overly long, confusing, and not backed by any law. Notably, it also highlighted that the previous SEC administration relied on creating confusion among market participants to mask its failure to consistently uphold the law. In order to end the regulatory roadblock, blockchain startup Ripple Labs has made three proposals to the U.S. SEC in order to end any further confusion. As mentioned in our previous report, Ripple is working on a cross-appeal against the US SEC next month in mid-April, with the likelihood of a lawsuit settlement. Following the settlement, there’s a growing chance of having an XRP ETF and Ripple IPO launch by the end of 2025. Following the victory of Donald Trump in US Presidential Elections, the crypto regulatory landscape has been changing for the good as the Trump administration plans to bring several crypto-friendly policies in place. The SEC’s potential reversal of the Regulation ATS expansion may reduce compliance burdens on crypto exchanges and DeFi platforms, fostering greater innovation, as mentioned in our previous story.